A Simulation – Based Evaluation of Mixed Systematic Sampling Design

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 25, 2022
Keywords:
Mixed Systematic Random Sampling Simulation

Main Article Content

Napasorn Rattanawuttikajohn
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
Nat Kulvanich
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to use Mixed Systematic Random Sampling (MRSS), Circular Systematic Sampling (CSS), and Fractional Interval for circumstances when the sample selection range was not an integer. When a population trends linearly with mean square error (MSE) and the efficiency of all three systematic sampling methods is compared with relative efficiency (RE). The findings indicate that Mixed Systematic Random Sampling (MRSS) produced the greatest MSE values when compared to Circular Systematic Sampling (CSS) and Fractional Interval.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rattanawuttikajohn, N. ., & Kulvanich , N. . (2022). A Simulation – Based Evaluation of Mixed Systematic Sampling Design. KKU Science Journal, 50(2), 126–135. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KKUSciJ/article/view/250305
Issue
Vol. 50 No. 2 (2022): May - August 2022
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Boonchom Srisaard. (1995). Introduction to Research. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Suweerivasarn.

Charin Kukusamit and Amnuay Maneesriwongul. (1998). Comparison of Three Random Sampling Method : Circular Systematic Sampling, New Systematic Sampling, and Bilinear Systematic Sampling. Nida Development Journal 38(1): 13-18.

Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J.J., Couper, M.P., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E. and Tourangeau, R. (2004). Servey Methedology (1st ed.). Wiley-Interscience. pp. 119-120.

Hankin, D.G., Mohr, M.S. and Newman, K.B. (2019). Sampling Theory: For the Ecological and Natural Resource Sciences. Oxford University Press.

Huang, C.K., (2004). Mixed random systematic sampling designs. Metrika 59: 1-11.

Jammaree Thuksoon. (2000). Comparative Study of Efficiency of Statistics from Various Types of Systematic Sampling. Chiang Mai University. (in press)

Nakharin Kaewsrasean and Ampai Thongteeraparp. (2012). Comparative Efficiency of Four Systematic Sampling Methods. Veridian E-Journal SU 5(3): 420-428.

Prachum Suwattee. (2009). Sample surveys: sampling designs and analysis (1st ed.). National Institute of Development Administration.

Subramani, J. (2018). On Circular systematic sampling in the presence of linear trend. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal 7(4): 286-292.