FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADAPTATION OF PRODUCT DESIGN CURRICULA BY INTEGRATING PRODUCT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY IN THE AI ERA

Authors

  • Thanate Piromgarm Department of Architectural and Design Education, School of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520 Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55003/JIE.25101

Keywords:

Factors affecting curriculum adaptation, Product design, Technology integration, Product design in the AI era

Abstract

The rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the 21st century have had a profound impact on the structure of education systems and innovation processes, particularly in product design, a discipline requiring the integration of creativity, technology, and user understanding. This review aims to describe and analyze the key factors influencing the adaptation of product design curricula in the AI ​​era through a synthesis of academic literature, international trend reports, and innovative education frameworks. The synthesis reveals that curriculum adaptation is not simply about adding AI content, but a systemic change encompassing curriculum structure, learning processes, and the roles of stakeholders. The first key factor is the advancement of AI technology and digital tools such as generative design and virtualization, which improve the efficiency and accuracy of the design process. Secondly, there is a growing demand for future skills, especially human-like skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving, which are increasingly crucial in a context where AI can replace some technical tasks. In summary, adapting product design curricula in the AI ​​era is a dynamic process requiring the integration of multiple dimensions: technology, human skills, ethics, and educational structure. Developing a curriculum that aligns with this context will empower learners to become creative designers, use technology critically, and compete sustainably at the international level.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.

Forbes. (2023). The future of skills in the AI era. https://www.forbes.com.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.

Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552.

Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 72–79.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

OECD. (2021). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org.

QS. (2026). Future of higher education report. https://www.topuniversities.com.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org.

Yakman, G. (2008). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Purdue University Conference Proceedings.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Piromgarm, T. (2026). FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADAPTATION OF PRODUCT DESIGN CURRICULA BY INTEGRATING PRODUCT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY IN THE AI ERA. Journal of Industrial Education, 25(1), A1-A10. https://doi.org/10.55003/JIE.25101

Issue

Section

Review Article