WORKSHOP EVALUATION RESEARCHING IN THE CLASSROOM TO IMPROVE THE TEACHING AND LEARNING, IN ACCORDANCE TO THE PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (PA).
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is the training evaluation of the workshop for the research in the classroom to improve the teaching and learning, in accordance to the Performance Agreement, with the application of CIPP evaluation model. There are four components in this evaluation model; context, input, implementation, and impact. The Kirkpatrick’s model, developed by Donald L. Kirkpatrick, is also used to evaluate the results of this training program by evaluating reactions, learning, and behaviour changed after the training. Participants in this research are 37 students from department of mechanical education, faculty of industrial education, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, 28 lecturers from the educational institutes affiliating with Office of the Vocational Education Commission, and four training facilitators. Tools for this research consist; interviewing forms; questionnaire measuring opinion towards the training; survey measuring the effect of the training in terms of expectation follow-up; questionnaire measuring the application of the knowledge gained from the training in jobs; survey measuring the training impact training activity tracking, and project document evaluation. This research concludes that the context, which is the objective of the project, is consistent with the needs of workshop attendees and the project objective is also consistent with the societal problems and presented societal context. Therefore, the implementation of this project is highly needed. Input factors; instructional media, tools, and training facilitators are ranked at the highest ( = 4.60, SD.
= 0.53). In term of processes, the expectation of the projects, knowledge, and understanding in writing articles from the training in jobs, there are ranked at the highest (
= 4.69, SD = 0.52). Application of knowledge are ranked at the high (
= 4.35, SD = 0.74). In term of impact, values and benefits of the project are ranked at the highest (
= 4.55, SD = 0.64).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"
References
Boonananwong, C., & Richkamroph, N. (2019). The evaluation of health promotion school project under Saraburi primary education service area office in cipp model. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkron Rajabhat University, 14(2), 43-53. (in Thai)
Buosonte, R. (2013). CIPP and CIPIEST Evaluation Models: Mistaken and Precise Concepts of Applications. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 7-24. (in Thai)
Charoontham, O. (2019). Factors efecting on quality of classroom action research according to perception of primary school administrators under the office of the basic education commission. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkron Rajabhat University, 13(1), 190-201. (in Thai)
Fongsri, P. (2013). Technical method for project evaluation (8th ed.). Darn Sutha Press Company Limited. (in Thai)
Ketchatturat, J. (2019). Classroom research. https://www.anyflip.com/waifj/obuy (in Thai)
National Education Act B.E. 2542. (1999, August 14). Royal Thai Government Gazette. Vol. 116, Sect. 74a. pp. 1-19. (in Thai)
Saelee, S. (2014). An assessment of returning teachers to students project by applying cipp model in schools under kanchanaburi primary educational service area office 3 [Master’ s thesis]. Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University. (in Thai)
Sawadsaringkarn, P. (2019). 4-Level of Training Evaluation Model [Kirkpatrick]. https://drpiyanan.com/2019/05/23/4-level-of-training-evaluation-model-kirkpatrick/ (in Thai)
Somphong, P. (2012). An Evaluation of training program of nursing specialty in nurse practitioner (Primary medical care) [Master’ s thesis]. Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)
Tangchitcharoenkhul, R. (2019). Research and development for the classroom action research competencies of early childhood teachers under childhood development centers, local administrative organization using participatory action research with partnerships. Silpakorn University Journal, 39(6), 1-20. (in Thai)
Ungsakun, B. (1994). The role of secondary school administrators to promote school research of Department of General Education, educational region twelve [Master’ s thesis]. Srinakharinwirot University. (in Thai)
Wangthong, P. (2015). The effectiveness of the personnel from nonviolent communication training course at Plearnpattana School. Journal of Thai Interdisciplinary Research, 10(1), 78-101. (in Thai)