FUTURE SCENARIOS AND FORESIGHTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FOR ASTRONOMY AND SPACE LEARNING CENTERS IN THAILAND

Main Article Content

Chaloemchon Wannathong
Rachada Boonkaew
Vichit Rangpan

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and forecast future scenarios regarding the environmental management of astronomy and space learning centers in Thailand over the next decade. As the initial phase of a broader mixed-methods study, this article adopts a qualitative approach utilizing the Ethnographic Delphi Futures Research (EDFR) technique. A panel of 24 key experts was purposively selected; notably, 75% of the informants hold doctoral degrees, while 54.2% possess more than 16 years of professional experience. Data collection was conducted through in-depth inquiries, followed by rigorous content analysis.


The Phase 1 qualitative findings, extracted from in-depth inquiries, establish three distinct future scenarios. First, the worst-case scenario underscores impending crises driven by urban expansion, physical structures obstructing astronomical visibility, environmental negligence, and a disproportionate focus on research that consequently marginalizes public service. Second, the desirable scenario portrays the successful integration of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), net-zero carbon policies, responsible tourism, and the advancement of citizen science. Third, the most probable scenario reflects a pragmatic adaptation characterized by the concurrent use of technology and nature conservation, the establishment of collaborative networks, and workforce development designed to accommodate the emerging space economy. Ultimately, these findings provide a strategic empirical foundation for elevating Thailand’s astronomical learning facilities toward long-term sustainability.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wannathong, C., Boonkaew , R. ., & Rangpan, V. . (2026). FUTURE SCENARIOS AND FORESIGHTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FOR ASTRONOMY AND SPACE LEARNING CENTERS IN THAILAND. Journal of Energy and Environment Technology of Graduate School Siam Technology College, 13(1), 18–30. retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JEET/article/view/267188
Section
Research Article

References

Lawrence, A., Rawls, M. L., Jah, M., Boley, A. C., Di Vruno, F., Garrington, S., Kramer, M., Lawler, S., Lowenthal, J. D., McDowell, J., & McCaughrean, M. J. (2022). The case for space environmentalism. Nature Astronomy, 6(4), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01655-6

Losch, A. (2020). Developing our Planetary Plan with an 18th United Nations Sustainable Development Goal: Space Environment. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 76(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i1.5951.

Martínez-Ramos, S. A., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., Gutiérrez, A. F., Sevilla-Camacho, P. Y., & Mendiola-Santibañez, J. D. (2021). The learning space as support to sustainable development: A revision of uses and design processes. Sustainability, 13(21), 11609. http://doi.org/10.3390/su132111609.

Suwansaenthavee, V., & Suwansaenthavee, M. (2020). Future Research Basic, EDF. Journal of Buddhist Philosophy Evolved, 4(1), 91–102. https://ojs.mbu.ac.th/index.php/jbpe/article/view/833/637

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley.

Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21.

Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of futures studies: History, purposes, and knowledge. Transaction Publishers.

Ketudat, S. (1991). The middle path for the future of Thailand: Technology in harmony with culture and environment. Thai Watana Panich Press.

Sardar, Z. (2010). The namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—What's in a name?. Futures, 42(3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001

Tekhanmag, K. (1988). Scenarios and alternatives in the futures for cultural implementations in the year B.E. 2540 [Master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University].

Thamwapi, P., & Thongkamsamut, C. (2024). Guidelines for green building criteria-based building improvement: A case study: The College of Local Administration Khon Kaen University. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 9(5), 339–355. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jomld/article/view/266804

Khetkrathok, N., & Suluksna, K. (2019). Guidelines for the management of thermal comfort conditions in air-conditioned areas for energy saving case study library building Suranaree University of Technology. Engineering and Technology Horizons, 36(1), 17–24. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/lej/article/view/240131/163693

Klinchoey, R., & Boonyaputthipong, C. (2023). Guidelines for improving building to reduce energy consumption case study: Watabaek Subdistrict Administrative Organization Office, Thepsathit District, Chaiyaphum Province. Journal of Architecture, Design and Construction, 6(2), 12–25. https://so02.tci-thaijo. org/index.php/Jadc/article/view/264036/181333

Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439

Youyuenyong, P. (2013). Light pollution and astronomical observatories: Guidelines for by-laws to reduce light pollution problems. Humanity and Social Science Journal Ubon Ratchathani University, 4(2), 45–64. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/human_ubu/article/view/85371/67944

Center for Maunakea Stewardship. (n.d.). Community-based Stewardship. University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo. Retrieved from https://hilo.hawaii.edu/maunakea/stewardship/community-based-stewardship

European Southern Observatory. (2025). Dark Skies Council: International astronomical observatories join forces to protect Chile’s skies. ESO Announcements. Retrieved from https://www.eso.org/public/ announcements/annlang25004-es-cl/

Knödlseder, J., Brau-Nogué, S., Coriat, M., Garnier, P., Hughes, A., Laurent, P., & Tibaldo, L. (2022). Estimate of the carbon footprint of astronomical research infrastructures. Nature Astronomy, 6(4), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01612-3

W. M. Keck Observatory. (2022, November 22). W. M. Keck Observatory Sets Climate Action Goal: Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2035. Retrieved from https://keckobservatory.org/climate-action/

Chen, C.-C., & Lin, P.-H. (2016). Development and evaluation of a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for astronomy education. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 644–661. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.915417

Poolpatarachewin, C. (2003). Ethnographic Delphi futures research (EDFR). Journal of Education Studies, 32(1), https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/educujournal/vol32/iss1/2

Bamrungsetthapong, S., Tharnpanya, P., & Satjaharuthai, K. (2020). Hybrid learning and the quality improvement of Thailand’s education in the 21st century. Nakkhabut Paritat Journal, 12(3), 213–224. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakboot/article/view/245900/168814

Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ encyclopedia2010031.

Jamkrajang, T. (2017). The role of community in environmental management: Case study of Sa-Nguankam community, Khwaeng Nong Khang Phlu, Nong Kheam district, Bangkok [Master's independent study, Thammasat University].

Kokamai, Y., & Weerapalangkoon, W. (2019). Participation of community members in environmental management in Bang Len sub-district municipality, Bang Yai district, Nonthaburi. HUSO Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 12–29. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/husojournalpnru/ article/view/245624/166389

Kyba, C. C. M., Altıntaş, Y. Ö., Walker, C. E., & Newhouse, M. (2023). Citizen scientists report global rapid reductions in the visibility of stars from 2011 to 2022. Science, 379(6629), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq7781.