Gamification Pedagogy Trigger Design for Creative Experiences in Metaverse Class Room
Keywords:
Gamification, Pedagogy, Trigger Design, Creative Experiences, Metaverse in Classroom, Creative processAbstract
The aim of this study is to design a creative process for learners. The design focuses on a pedagogy for course activities based on principles from gamification research that foregrounds the relationship between instructional practices and game-based course design for learning. The research is divided into two phases: Trigger with learner psychology and the creative experiences during learning. The research aims to shape the relationship between gamification elements and pedagogical design. The design framework will inform the creative process in the Metaverse classroom. The framework identifies critical features of the creative process that emerge throughout the learning process. Creativity will be measured by examining domain-relevant and creativity-related skills and task motivation during learning in the Metaverse environment. The research approach applies survey and observation techniques to examine the extent to which people are engaged in creative processes during their participation in the Metaverse classroom. The pedagogical design background focuses on the approach that enhances the player's interaction with the interactive elements and provides useful insights into the learner's skills and engagement. Engagement can be improved through the use of triggering gamification elements. The results show how gamification pedagogy enhances the creative experience process in the Metaverse environment. These guidelines can be used in the pedagogical design process to better promote creative learning activities. An important contribution to the research is the ability to design instructional activities that promote creative thinking through engaging interactions with technology.
References
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357.
Amabile, T. M. (Singer-songwriter). (1996). Creativity in Context.Westview Press Inc.
Augenstein, D., & Morschheuser, B. (2022). Understanding human factors in the metaverse—An autonomous driving experiment. In Proc. European Conf. on Information Systems, Research in Progress.
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). An introduction to rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 21-30). Routledge.
Book experience
Bower, Matt. (2006). Virtual classroom pedagogy. ACM Sigcse Bulletin,38,148-152.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological review, 67(6), 380.
Contreras, G. S., González, A. H., Fernández, M. I. S., Martínez, C. B., Cepa, J., & Escobar, Z. (2022). The importance of the application of the metaverse in education. Modern Applied Science, 16(3), 1-34.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In A pedagogy of multiliteracies(pp. 1-36). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. InA pedagogy of multiliteracies(pp. 1-36). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008. 10
Díaz, J. E. M. (2020). Virtual world as a complement to hybrid and mobile learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(22), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i22.14393
Dweck, C. S. (2009). Mindsets: Developing talent through a growth mindset. Olympic Coach,21(1),4-7.
Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art.Wiley New York.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does Gamification Work?-A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification[Paper presentation]. HICSS.
Inchamnan, W., Wyeth, P., Johnson, D., & Conroy, D. (2012). A method for measuring the creative potential of computer games. In Entertainment Computing-ICEC 2012: 11th International Conference, ICEC 2012, Bremen, Germany. Proceedings 11(pp. 270-283). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Inchamnan, W., Wyeth, P., & Johnson, D. (2014). Design for creative activity: A framework for analyzing the creative potential of computer games. In Entertainment Computing–ICEC 2014: 13th International Conference, ICEC 2014, Sydney, Australia, October 1-3, 2014. Proceedings 13(pp. 19-26). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45212-7_3
Inchamnan, W., Yampray, K., Niranatlamphong, W., & Imsombut, A. (2022, November). The Pedagogy Gamification Design for Fun Engagement. In 2022 6th International Conference on Information Technology (InCIT)(pp. 39-44). IEEE.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200-222.
Knowles, M.S. (1990).The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species(4thed.).Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
Kuindersma, E., van der Pal, J., van den Herik, J., & Plaat, A. (2017). Building a game to build competencies. In Games and Learning Alliance: 6th International Conference, GALA 2017(pp. 14-24). Springer International Publishing.
Luke, A., Cazden, C. B., Lin, A., & Freebody, P. (2004). The Singapore classroom coding scheme: Technical report. National Institute of Education, Center for Research on Pedagogy and Practice, Singapore.
Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In the Proc. 6th international conference on virtual learning ICVL.
McGinnis, T., Bustard, D. W., Black, M., & Charles, D. (2008). Enhancing e-learning engagement using design patterns from computer games. In First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction(pp. 124-130). IEEE.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Herman, A. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2008). Creativity and cognitive processes: Multi-level linkages between individual and team cognition. In Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation(Vol. 7, pp. 203-267). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Reiter-Palmon, R. (2018). Creative cognition at the individual and team levels: What happens before and after idea generation. The nature of human creativity, 186-207.
Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M. & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 243-263
Santanen, E. L., Briggs, R. O., & de Devreede, G.-J. (2002). Toward an understanding of creative solution generation. InProceedings of the 35thAnnual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2899-2908). IEEE.
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of human-computer studies, 74, 14-31.
Simpson, P., & Jenkins, P. (2015). Gamification and Human Resources: an overview. (pp. 1-6). Brighton: Brighton Business School.
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L. K., Beyoglu, D., Altinat, F., Sharma, R. C., Altinay, Z., Li, Z. S., Liu, J. H., Ahmad, F., Hu, Y., Salha, S., Abed, M., & Burgos, D.(2022). Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments,9,1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x.
Wang, Y. (2008). On cognitive foundations of creativity and the cognitive process of creation. In2008 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics(pp. 104-113).IEEE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Applied Science and Emerging Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
