Publication Ethics
Position : Editor-in-Chief, Editor, Co-Editor, and Editorial Team
1) Execute in accordance with the timeline preferences of both the readers and the author.
2) Consistently enhance and elevate the journal's quality.
3) Receive articles and establish a process for evaluating and considering them through double-blind peer review for
potential publication in the journal."
4) Responsible for regularly overseeing the peer review process of journal articles to ensure alignment with
the journal's operational procedures and the scope of academic disciplines it accepts."
5) Support and encourage the freedom to express academic opinions of authors.
6) Published article content while maintaining academic accuracy.
7) Supporting freedom of expression but not considering articles containing content that criticize, distort, or defame
institutions like the monarchy, religious organizations, or government institutions.
8) “We will consider articles impartially without any bias from the authors and reviewers.
9) We will not consider personal opinions unrelated to the academic content when making decisions to accept or reject
articles.
10) We will refrain from repurposing or rephrasing the articles we evaluate or the findings we uncover as our own new
articles.
11) We will not seek any business-related benefits from the authors, readers, or any reviewers.
12) We will not reveal the authors' personal information or any personal data present in the articles unless we have
obtained explicit written consent.
13) In case any issues arise that surpass the authority and responsibilities of the editor, the matter will be referred to
the editorial team for a decision, which will be based on a consensus reached through collective agreement.
Ethics of Reviewer
1) Evaluating the article will be done willingly, according to the individual’s academic abilities.
2) The reviewer will not be aware of the author's name until the article is published.
3) The reviewer will promptly inform the editor or editorial team immediately. if they discover any personal
connection or potential bias related to the content of the article. This is to reduce bias in the process of
considering articles.
4) The reviewer will not incorporate the articles under review, nor will they replicate or rephrase the discovered
results to create their own new articles.
5) Reviewers must assess the scholarly quality of the articles and provide specific justifications for their
recommendations regarding article acceptance or rejection. These recommendations should be documented within
the system for the editorial team or editor to review.
6) The review must be completed within the timeframe specified.
Ethics of Author
1) The articles submitted to the journal must not have been previously published or currently under consideration for
publication in any form, including but not limited to blogs, online social networks, print media, journals, books,
magazines, or any other platform accessible to the public.
2) The submitted article must not contain plagiarism, and all sources should be properly attributed. Research data
should not be manipulated, tampered with, altered, concealed, or omitted.
3) Submitted articles must exhibit a similarity index with content from sources such as blogs, online social networks,
print media, journals, books, or magazines that does not exceed 30%. This calculation exclusively considers the
content within the articles.
4) Authors are required to accurately cite the works of others in accordance with academic standards and the format
specified by the journal.
5) Authors must not infringe upon the copyright of others' data, content, or images within their own articles.
Proper referencing must be provided when necessary.
6) All co-authors must consent to and be aware of the submission of this article to the JASET journal. This is done by
adding all co-authors to the system before submitting the article for consideration.
7) The content within the article represents the opinions of all authors and is the responsibility of the authors and the
co- authors
8) Authors must present an ethics certification document if the article involves research related to human/animal
research ethics policy, in accordance with the conditions specified by the National Research Council (if applicable).
