Concrete Pavement Monitoring with Ground Penetrating Radar

Main Article Content

ณรงค์ชัย วิวัฒนาช่าง
ชนะรบ วิชาลัย
วีระพงษ์ พจนพิมล

Abstract

Pavement subsidences in Thailand have often damaged due to voids beneath the concrete pavement, which are likely prone to more widespread sub pavement erosion and further void development, making their early detection an important aspect of highway maintenance and remediation. As a fast and non-destructive testing tool, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) can provide valuable information for the development of road repair and maintenance programs. This study, GPR forward modeling of concrete pavement model was constructed to test parameters that aff ected to GPR data collection in the fi eld. Study results indicated that a frequency of 900 MHz is suitable for void detection in both GPR forward modeling and concrete pavement model results. Real data collection in the fi eld using 900 MHz antenna before and after repaired by sub-sealing method also showed signifi cant of sub-base structure improvement at repaired locations.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
วิวัฒนาช่าง ณ., วิชาลัย ช., and พจนพิมล ว., “Concrete Pavement Monitoring with Ground Penetrating Radar”, RMUTI Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 17–31, Dec. 2018.
Section
Research article

References

[1] Bancha, F., Vijitachara, S., Saree, S., Sakechai, A., and Pornchai, S. (2004). Measurement of Cavity Filling Under Concrete Slabs by GPR and FWD. Report No. 211. Bureau of Road Research and Development. Department of Highways. Ministry of Transport. Thailand. (In Thai)

[2] Sato, M. (2005). Short Course Lecture Note on GPR and Its Application to Environmental Study. Lecture note of the Short course on Ground Penetration Radar and Electric Imaging for Solving Engineering Problem. AIT Bangkok, Thailand. 7-9 November 2005. Asian Institute of Technology. Thailand.

[3] Topp, G. C., Davis, J. L., and Annan, A. P. (1980). Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content: Measurement in Coaxial Transmission Line. Water Resources. Vol. 16, pp. 574-582. DOI: 10.1029/WR016i003p00574

[4] GSSI. (2017). Antennas Manual. Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Access (4 April 2018). Available (https://www.geophysical.com)

[5] Antonis, G. (2006). GprMax2D/3D simulator Version 2.0. Access (20 November 2017). Available (https://www.gprmax.com/code/UserGuideV2.pdf)

[6] ASTM D4748-98. (2002). Standard Test Method for Determining Thickness of Bound Pavement Layers Using Short-Pulse Radar. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2002, Section 04: Construction Soil and Rock (I). American Society for Testing and Materials. Vol. 04.08.

[7] Wiwattanachang, N., Giao, P. H., and Vichalai, C. (2015). Crack Detection in Fiber Concrete by Electrical Imaging Methods. The 4th International Symposium on the Fusion science and Technologies (ISFT2015). RUS. Pra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Thailand.

[8] Chatterjee, R. (1989). Antenna Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New Age International Inc.

[9] CWP/SU. (2011). Seismic Un*x Release No. 43. An open source software package for seismic research and processing. Center for Wave Phenomena. Colorado School of Mines. Access (22 November 2017). Available (https://www.cwp.mines.edu/cwpcodes)

[10] SEGJ. (2004). Application of geophysical methods to engineering and environmental problems. Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan. Japan.