An Effect of Sub-Surface Moisture Content on GPR Survey Performance

Main Article Content

ชนะรบ วิชาลัย

Abstract

Performance of the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) depends on the wave reflectivity as shown as the amplitude height that varied with environmental conditions. Moisture content in sub-surface material has a large effect on signal attenuation. This research presents an effect of moisture content in asphaltic concrete road pavement and Concrete Treated Base (CTB) layers that would cause GPR signal to detection of water table. The simple methods to examine dielectric constant (gif.latex?\varepsilon) from two-way travel time of samples those collected from the field were tested in laboratory both dry and wet conditions. These test results were employed for time-to-depth conversion for GPR data interpretation and explanation of capillary effect that caused GPR results as it has difficulty to indicate groundwater table on the radar gram. The CTB sample was tested for rising of capillary force in the laboratory. However, GPR signal modelling was done to verify capillary effect on filed data and laboratory testing results. Study results found the dielectric constant of dry and wet asphaltic concrete samples are 7 and 20, respectively. The modelling of capillary test in 24 hrs indicate the capillary zone is height of 4.3 cm and GPR wave modelling shows reflectivity of GPR signal was reduced due to capillary effect.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
วิชาลัย ช., “An Effect of Sub-Surface Moisture Content on GPR Survey Performance”, RMUTI Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Nov. 2019.
Section
บทความวิจัย (Research article)

References

Carl, L., Pannir, K., Kenji, Y., Steve, A., and Prasad, G. (2003). Design and Field Experiments of a Ground‐Penetrating Radar for Mars Exploration. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 108, Issue E4, pp. 15-1 to 15-12. DOI: 10.1029/2003JE002113

Liu, L. B., Qian, R. Y., Li, J., Sun, M. G., and Ge, S. C. (2016). GPR Detection of Subsurface Voids and Its Validation Based on Similarity Principle. In 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). Hong Kong, 2016, pp. 1-4

Gary, K. (1998). Effect of Soil Moisture on Radar Detection of Simulant Mines. Fact Sheet. Access (25 July 2018). Available (https://uxoinfo.com/blogcfc/client/enclosures/CRREL26.pdf)

Topp, G. C., Davis, J. L., and Annan, A. P. (1980). Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content Measurement in Coaxial Transmission Line. Water Resources Research. Vol. 16, Issue 3, pp. 574-582. DOI: 10.1029/WR016i003p00574

Giao P. H., Vichalai, C., and Hien, D. H. (2007). A Study on Geotechnical and Geophysical Properties of Styrofoam Material for Construction of a Concrete Pavement Model, Proc. Intl’Symp. Hanoi Geoengineering 2007, November 2007, Hanoi, Vietnam, pp. 11-17

Von Hippel AR (ed). (1954). Dielectric Materials and Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, USA

Davis, J. L., Annan, A. P. (1989). Ground Penetrating Radar for High-Resolution Mapping of Soil and Rock Stratigraphy. Geophysics Prospecting Journal. Vol. 37, Issue 5, pp. 531-551. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.x

Hoekstra, P. and Delaney, A. (1974). Dielectric Properties of Soils at UHF and Microwave Frequencies. Journal of Geophysical Research. Vol. 79, Issue 11, pp. 1699-1708. DOI: 10.1029/JB079i011p01699

Arthur R. von Hippel. (1954). Dielectrics and Waves. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, USA. p. 537

Kirsch, R. (2006). Ground Penetration Radar (GPR). In Groundwater Geophysics : A Tool for Hydrology. Second Edition, Springer. p. 232

Baker-Jarvis, J., Janezic, M. D., and DeGroot, D. C. (2010). High-Frequency Dielectric Measurements, Part 24 in a Series of Tutorials on Instrumentation and Measurement. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine. pp. 24-31

Yaw, K. C. (2012). Measurement of Dielectric Material Properties Application Note. Rhode and Shawrtz Technical Publication

ASTM D4748-10. (2015). Standard Test Method for Determining Thickness of Bound Pavement Layers using Short-Pulse Radar. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2002, Section 04: Construction Soil and Rock (I). American Society for Testing and Materials. Vol. 04.08.

Asian Institute of Technology (2009). An Investigation of Shallow Groundwater Conditions in the CTB Layer at the Suvarnabhumi International Airport. Final report. School of Engineering and Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.

Geoscanner, A. B. (2006). GPRSim.net. Access (27 July 2018). Available (www.geoscanners.com)

Antonis, G. (2006). GprMaxV2.0. Access (27 July 2018). Available (www.gprmax.org)

Shang, J. Q., Umana, J. A., Bartlett, F. M., and Rossiter, J. R. (1999). Measurement of Complex Permittivity of Asphalt Pavement Materials. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 125, Issue 4, pp. 347-356

Gomes, A. M. (2003). Permeability of Concrete: A Study Intended for the “in situ” Valuation Using Portable Instruments and Traditional Techniques. In Proceeding of International Symposium on Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE). September 16-19, in Berlin, Germany

Brama, M. D. and Khaled, S. (2014). Capillary Force in the Soil. In Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. eight edition. USA