พฤติกรรมบริเวณตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่านของทางรถไฟและเทคนิคการปรับปรุงประสิทธิภาพ
Article Sidebar
เผยแพร่แล้ว:
ก.ค. 4, 2018
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
ตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่าน (Transition zone) บนทางรถไฟเป็นบริเวณที่มีความแตกต่างกันของโครงสร้างที่รองรับทางซึ่งจะส่งผลให้ทางรถไฟในบริเวณดังกล่าวมีค่าสติฟเนส (Stiffness) ที่ต่างกัน ในขณะที่รถไฟเคลื่อนที่ผ่านบริเวณตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่าน บริเวณที่มีสติฟเนสต่ำกว่าจะมีการยุบตัวของทางรถไฟมากกว่า ส่งผลให้เกิดแรงกระแทกของล้อที่กระทำต่อราง (Wheel-rail impact force) พฤติกรรมดังกล่าวเป็นสาเหตุหลักที่ทำให้เกิดความเสื่อมสภาพและความเสียหายอย่างรุนแรงกับทางรถไฟบริเวณตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่าน ดังนั้นบริเวณดังกล่าวจึงจำเป็นต้องมีรอบการบำรุงรักษาที่มากกว่าทางรถไฟในบริเวณอื่น อย่างไรก็ตามการเลือกใช้เทคนิควิธีการปรับปรุงสติฟเนสของทางรถไฟที่เหมาะสมจะช่วยชะลอการเสื่อมสภาพของทางรถไฟทำให้มีอายุการใช้งานนานขึ้นรวมถึงลดค่าใช้จ่ายในการบำรุงรักษา บทความฉบับนี้ได้ทำการรวบรวมเทคนิคการปรับปรุงประสิทธิภาพของทางรถไฟบริเวณตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่าน คุณสมบัติทางกล ประสิทธิภาพการลดทอนการสั่นในแต่ละเทคนิค และมาตรฐานต่างๆที่เกี่ยวข้องกับเทคนิคการปรับปรุงตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่านจากงานวิจัยที่เกี่ยวข้อง รวมถึงได้รวบรวมและสำรวจวิธีการปรับปรุงและปัญหาที่เกิดขึ้นกับตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่านในเส้นทางรถไฟระหว่างเมืองของการรถไฟแห่งประเทศไทยในปัจจุบัน ผลจากการศึกษาเปรียบเทียบในบทความนี้สามารถใช้เป็นแนวทางสำหรับการนำไปประยุกต์ใช้กับการปรับปรุงโครงสร้างทางรถไฟในบริเวณตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่านได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพต่อไป
Article Details
How to Cite
Paoleng, P., Parichartprecha, R., & Suthasupradit, S. (2018). พฤติกรรมบริเวณตำแหน่งเปลี่ยนผ่านของทางรถไฟและเทคนิคการปรับปรุงประสิทธิภาพ. วิศวกรรมสาร มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร, 13(1), 74–87. สืบค้น จาก https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nuej/article/view/96037
บท
Review Paper
References
[1] Jenks, C. W. (2006). Design of track transitions. Transportation Research Board.
[2] Quirchmair, M., & Loy, H. (2015). Managing Track Stiffness in Transition Zones. Railway Gazette International.
[3] Quirchmair, M., & Loy, H. (2016). Optimization at track transition zones by specially engineered PU pads. Rail Business[Focus-India].
[4] COELHO, E. Z. (2011). Dynamics of railway transition zones in soft soils. (Doctor), University of Porto, Portugal, Portugal.
[5] Optimisation of Transition Zones. (2016). In gatzner (Ed.).
[6] Cristina Alves Ribeiro, Rui Calçada, & Delgado, R. (2017). Experimental assessment of the dynamic behaviour of the train-track system at a culvert transition zone. Engineering Structures, 138 215–228.
[7] SHAHBAZ RASHID. (2011). Parametric study of bridge response to high speed trains : Ballasted track on concrete bridges. (Master of Science Thesis), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Sañudoa, R., dell’Olio, L., Casado, J. A., Carrascal, I. A., & b, S. D. (2016). Track transitions in railways: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 140–157.
[9] Sañudoa, R., Miranda, M., Markine, V., & dell´Olio, L. (2016). The Influence of Train Running Direction and Track Supports Position on The Behaviour of Transition Zones. Transportation Research Procedia, 18, 281 – 288. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.037
[10] Y.S.Kang, Yang, S. C., Lee, H. S., Kim, Y. B., Jang, S. Y., & Kim, E. (2014). A Study of Track and Train Dynamic Behavior of Transition Zone Between Concrete Slab Track and Ballasted Track.
[11] Inmculada Gallego, Santos Sánchez-Cambronero, & Rivas, A. (2012). Criteria for Improving the Embankment- Structure Transition Design in Railway Lines. Infrastructure Design, Signalling and Security in Railway, 355-374.
[12] Roberto Sañudo, Mikel Cerrada, Borja Alonso, & dell’Olio, L. (2017). Analysis of the influence of support positions in transition zones. A numerical analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 145, 207–217.
[13] Ngoc Trung Ngo, & Buddhima Indraratna. (2016). Improved Performance of Rail Track Substructure Using Synthetic Inclusions: Experimental and Numerical Investigations. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng., 2(24). doi:10.1007/s40891-016-0065-3
[14] José N. Varandas, Paul Hölscher, & Manuel A.G. Silva. (2011). Dynamic behaviour of railway tracks on transitions zones. Computers and Structures, 89, 1468–1479.
[15] Yohannes, T. (2015). Effect of Track Stiffness Variation on the Dynamic Response of Passenger Vehicle. Addis Ababa University.
[16] Coenraad Esveld. (2001). MODERN RAILWAY TRACK (Second Edition ed.). Delft University of Technology: MRT-Productions,Netherlands.
[17] Selig, E. T., & Waters, J. M. (1994). Track geotechnology and substructure management.
[18] Coenraad Esveld. (2010). Recent Developments in High-Speed Track. First International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure, Croatia.
[19] Timothy D. Stark, Stephen T. Wilk, & Rose, J. G. (2016). Design and Performance of Well-Performing Railway Transitions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. doi:10.3141/2545-03
[20] Giannakos, K. and S. Tsoukantas, Transition Zone between Ballastless and Ballasted Track: Influence of Changing stiffness on acting forces. SciVerse ScienceDirect, 2012. 48: p. 3548-3557.
[21] Real, T., Zamorano, C., Hernández, C., García, J. A., & Real, J. I. (2016). Static and Dynamic Behavior of Transitions between Different Railway Track Typologies. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), 1356-1364.
[22] Eric Berggren. (2010). Railway Track Stiffness Dynamic Measurements and Evaluation for Efficient Maintenance. (Doctoral Thesis), KTH Engineering Science.
[23] Sakdirat Kaewunruen. (2015). Impact damage mechanism and mitigation by ballast bonding at railway bridge ends. The International Journal of Railway Technology. doi:10.4203/ijrt.3.4.x
[24] Luís Miguel Gouveia Coelho. (2015). Structure/Embankment Transitions in Railway Infra-structures Behaviour and National and International Practices. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa - Instituto Superior Técnico, P-1049-1001.
[25] Powrie, W. (2015). Understanding and improving the track system. Railway Gazette International.
[26] Li, D., D. Otter, et al. (2010). Railway bridge approaches under heavy axle load traffic: problems, causes, and remedies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F-Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 224(F5), 383-390. doi:10.1243/09544097jrrt345
[27] Li, D. Q., & D. Davis. (2005). Transition of railroad bridge approaches. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(11), 1392-1398.
[28] Mishra, D., E. Tutumluer, et al. . (2012). Investigation of differential movement at railroad bridge approaches through geotechnical instrumentation. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 13(11), 814-824. doi:10.1631/jzus.A12ISGT7
[29] Yao Shan, Bettina Albers, & Savidis, S. A. (2013). Influence of different transition zones on the dynamic response of track–subgrade systems. Computers and Geotechnics, 48, 21-28.
[30] Wehbi, M., Burrow, D. M., Ghatoara, D. G., & Shi, D. J. (2013). Investigating the Effects of Soft Spots on the Functional and Structural Condition of a Railway Track.
[31] Dahlberg, T. (2010). Railway Track Stiffness Variations – Consequences and Countermeasures. International Journal of Civil Engineerng, Vol. 8(No. 1).
[32] UIC-719-R. (2015a). Earthworks and track bed construction for railway lines leaflets and Reports (pp. 114).
[33] Nimbalkar S, & B, I. (2016). Improved performance of ballasted rail track using geosynthetics and rubber shockmat. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 142(8).
[34] Lakusˇi S, Ahac M, & I, H. (2010). Experimental investigation of railway track with under sleeper pad. Proceedings of the 10th Slovenian road and transportation congress, 386–393.
[35] Auersch L. (2006). Dynamic axle loads on tracks with and without ballast mats: numerical results of three-dimensional vehicle–track–soil models. Proc Inst Mech Eng F, 220(2), 169–183.
[36] Quirchmair, M. (2016). Elasticity in Railway Superstructure: Managing Track Stiffness in Transition Zones and Turnouts.
[37] Kerr, A. D., & B. E. Moroney. (1993). Track Transition Problems and Remedies. American Railway Engineering Association, 742, 267–298.
[38] Lund, H., & Åswärdh, A. (2014). Transition zones between ballasted and ballastless tracks. Lund University.
[39] UIC-719-R. (2015b). Earthworks and track bed construction for railway lines, UIC leaflets and Reports (pp. 114).
[40] Read, D., & Li, D. (2006). Design of track transitions. TCRP Research Results Digest, 79.
[41] Zhao, C., Wang, P., Yi, Q., & Meng, D. (2015). Application of Polyurethane Polymer and Assistant Rails to Settling the Abnormal Vehicle-Track Dynamic Effects in Transition Zone between Ballastless and Ballasted Track. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Shock and Vibration(Article ID 826362), 9. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/826362
[42] AREMA. (2005a). Plan 913-52 Portfolio of Trackwork Plans.
[2] Quirchmair, M., & Loy, H. (2015). Managing Track Stiffness in Transition Zones. Railway Gazette International.
[3] Quirchmair, M., & Loy, H. (2016). Optimization at track transition zones by specially engineered PU pads. Rail Business[Focus-India].
[4] COELHO, E. Z. (2011). Dynamics of railway transition zones in soft soils. (Doctor), University of Porto, Portugal, Portugal.
[5] Optimisation of Transition Zones. (2016). In gatzner (Ed.).
[6] Cristina Alves Ribeiro, Rui Calçada, & Delgado, R. (2017). Experimental assessment of the dynamic behaviour of the train-track system at a culvert transition zone. Engineering Structures, 138 215–228.
[7] SHAHBAZ RASHID. (2011). Parametric study of bridge response to high speed trains : Ballasted track on concrete bridges. (Master of Science Thesis), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Sañudoa, R., dell’Olio, L., Casado, J. A., Carrascal, I. A., & b, S. D. (2016). Track transitions in railways: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 140–157.
[9] Sañudoa, R., Miranda, M., Markine, V., & dell´Olio, L. (2016). The Influence of Train Running Direction and Track Supports Position on The Behaviour of Transition Zones. Transportation Research Procedia, 18, 281 – 288. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.037
[10] Y.S.Kang, Yang, S. C., Lee, H. S., Kim, Y. B., Jang, S. Y., & Kim, E. (2014). A Study of Track and Train Dynamic Behavior of Transition Zone Between Concrete Slab Track and Ballasted Track.
[11] Inmculada Gallego, Santos Sánchez-Cambronero, & Rivas, A. (2012). Criteria for Improving the Embankment- Structure Transition Design in Railway Lines. Infrastructure Design, Signalling and Security in Railway, 355-374.
[12] Roberto Sañudo, Mikel Cerrada, Borja Alonso, & dell’Olio, L. (2017). Analysis of the influence of support positions in transition zones. A numerical analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 145, 207–217.
[13] Ngoc Trung Ngo, & Buddhima Indraratna. (2016). Improved Performance of Rail Track Substructure Using Synthetic Inclusions: Experimental and Numerical Investigations. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng., 2(24). doi:10.1007/s40891-016-0065-3
[14] José N. Varandas, Paul Hölscher, & Manuel A.G. Silva. (2011). Dynamic behaviour of railway tracks on transitions zones. Computers and Structures, 89, 1468–1479.
[15] Yohannes, T. (2015). Effect of Track Stiffness Variation on the Dynamic Response of Passenger Vehicle. Addis Ababa University.
[16] Coenraad Esveld. (2001). MODERN RAILWAY TRACK (Second Edition ed.). Delft University of Technology: MRT-Productions,Netherlands.
[17] Selig, E. T., & Waters, J. M. (1994). Track geotechnology and substructure management.
[18] Coenraad Esveld. (2010). Recent Developments in High-Speed Track. First International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure, Croatia.
[19] Timothy D. Stark, Stephen T. Wilk, & Rose, J. G. (2016). Design and Performance of Well-Performing Railway Transitions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. doi:10.3141/2545-03
[20] Giannakos, K. and S. Tsoukantas, Transition Zone between Ballastless and Ballasted Track: Influence of Changing stiffness on acting forces. SciVerse ScienceDirect, 2012. 48: p. 3548-3557.
[21] Real, T., Zamorano, C., Hernández, C., García, J. A., & Real, J. I. (2016). Static and Dynamic Behavior of Transitions between Different Railway Track Typologies. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), 1356-1364.
[22] Eric Berggren. (2010). Railway Track Stiffness Dynamic Measurements and Evaluation for Efficient Maintenance. (Doctoral Thesis), KTH Engineering Science.
[23] Sakdirat Kaewunruen. (2015). Impact damage mechanism and mitigation by ballast bonding at railway bridge ends. The International Journal of Railway Technology. doi:10.4203/ijrt.3.4.x
[24] Luís Miguel Gouveia Coelho. (2015). Structure/Embankment Transitions in Railway Infra-structures Behaviour and National and International Practices. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa - Instituto Superior Técnico, P-1049-1001.
[25] Powrie, W. (2015). Understanding and improving the track system. Railway Gazette International.
[26] Li, D., D. Otter, et al. (2010). Railway bridge approaches under heavy axle load traffic: problems, causes, and remedies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F-Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 224(F5), 383-390. doi:10.1243/09544097jrrt345
[27] Li, D. Q., & D. Davis. (2005). Transition of railroad bridge approaches. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(11), 1392-1398.
[28] Mishra, D., E. Tutumluer, et al. . (2012). Investigation of differential movement at railroad bridge approaches through geotechnical instrumentation. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 13(11), 814-824. doi:10.1631/jzus.A12ISGT7
[29] Yao Shan, Bettina Albers, & Savidis, S. A. (2013). Influence of different transition zones on the dynamic response of track–subgrade systems. Computers and Geotechnics, 48, 21-28.
[30] Wehbi, M., Burrow, D. M., Ghatoara, D. G., & Shi, D. J. (2013). Investigating the Effects of Soft Spots on the Functional and Structural Condition of a Railway Track.
[31] Dahlberg, T. (2010). Railway Track Stiffness Variations – Consequences and Countermeasures. International Journal of Civil Engineerng, Vol. 8(No. 1).
[32] UIC-719-R. (2015a). Earthworks and track bed construction for railway lines leaflets and Reports (pp. 114).
[33] Nimbalkar S, & B, I. (2016). Improved performance of ballasted rail track using geosynthetics and rubber shockmat. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 142(8).
[34] Lakusˇi S, Ahac M, & I, H. (2010). Experimental investigation of railway track with under sleeper pad. Proceedings of the 10th Slovenian road and transportation congress, 386–393.
[35] Auersch L. (2006). Dynamic axle loads on tracks with and without ballast mats: numerical results of three-dimensional vehicle–track–soil models. Proc Inst Mech Eng F, 220(2), 169–183.
[36] Quirchmair, M. (2016). Elasticity in Railway Superstructure: Managing Track Stiffness in Transition Zones and Turnouts.
[37] Kerr, A. D., & B. E. Moroney. (1993). Track Transition Problems and Remedies. American Railway Engineering Association, 742, 267–298.
[38] Lund, H., & Åswärdh, A. (2014). Transition zones between ballasted and ballastless tracks. Lund University.
[39] UIC-719-R. (2015b). Earthworks and track bed construction for railway lines, UIC leaflets and Reports (pp. 114).
[40] Read, D., & Li, D. (2006). Design of track transitions. TCRP Research Results Digest, 79.
[41] Zhao, C., Wang, P., Yi, Q., & Meng, D. (2015). Application of Polyurethane Polymer and Assistant Rails to Settling the Abnormal Vehicle-Track Dynamic Effects in Transition Zone between Ballastless and Ballasted Track. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Shock and Vibration(Article ID 826362), 9. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/826362
[42] AREMA. (2005a). Plan 913-52 Portfolio of Trackwork Plans.