Implications of Ethanol Production on Agriculture, Water, Energy and Environment in Thailand

Main Article Content

Buncha Wattana

Abstract

Given growing demand for clean energy to mitigate greenhouse gases emissions, the Thai government has developed Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP) for the period 2015–2036. Under this plan, the production of ethanol is expected to grow considerably, from 3.5 million litres per day in 2015, to 11.3 million litres per day in 2036. Such an increase in the ethanol production would, inevitably, have a direct impact on water consumption and land use for growing energy crops. This paper, therefore, aims to assess the implications of ethanol production on agriculture, water, energy and environment. For this purpose, four scenarios (AEDP, SC50, S100 and C100), developed in this paper, represent a range of energy crops for ethanol production. An assessment developed in this study – employing a combination of GAEZ, CROPWAT and LEAP – has suggested that the selection of suitable crops for the purpose of ethanol production would have significant impacts on agriculture, energy, water and environment. The results show that ethanol production from sugar cane would require less crop cultivation area and less irrigation requirement than the production from cassava. In addition, it would not only contribute to higher crude oil savings but also generate less CO2 emissions and hence help mitigating CO2 emissions. Importantly, it would result in a higher net energy gain. A high crop production demand and fertilizer requirement could, however, become a challenge. This paper, therefore, recommends that the implementation of agricultural zoning, the advancement of crop species and ethanol conversion technology, and the promotion of organic fertilizer from agricultural residues and organic pesticides could be the effective strategies in order to overcome this challenge.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wattana, B. (2018). Implications of Ethanol Production on Agriculture, Water, Energy and Environment in Thailand. Naresuan University Engineering Journal, 12(2), 1–14. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nuej/article/view/75021
Section
Research Paper

References

Santamarίa, M., & Azqueta, D. (2015). Promoting biofuels use in Spain: A cost-benefit analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1415-1424.

Guo, M., Song, W., & Buhain J. (2015). Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 712-725.

Pradhan, A., & Mbohwa, C. (2014). Development of biofuels in South Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 1089-1100.

Zhao L, Chang S, Wang H, Zhang X, Ou X, Wang B, Wu M. Long-term projections of liquid biofuels in China: Uncertainties and potential benefits. Energy 2015; 83:37-54.

Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006). Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. (USA), 103, 11206-11210.

Biggs, E. M., Bruce, E., Boruff, B., Duncan, M. A., Horsley, J., Pauli, N., McNeill, K., Neef, A., Ogtrop, F. V., Curnow, J., Haworth, B., Duce, S., Imanari, Y. (2015). Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 389-397.

Gaina, A. K., Giupponi, & C., Benson, D. (2015). The water–energy–food (WEF) security nexus: The policy perspective of Bangladesh. Water Internationa, 40(5-6), 895-910.

Rasul, G. (2014). Food, water, and energy security in South Asia: A nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. Environmental Science and Policy, 39, 35–48.

Brazilian, M., Rogner, H., Howells, M., Hermann, S., Arent, D., Gielen, D., Steduto, P., Mueller, A., Komor, P., Tol, S. J., & Yumkella, K. K. (2012). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modeling approach. Energy Policy, 39 (12), 7896-7906.

Skaggs, R., Hibbard, K. A., Frumhoff, P., Lowry, T., Middleton, R., Pate, R., Tidwell, V. C., Arnold, J. G., Averyt, K., Janetos, A. C., Izaurralde, R. C., Rice, J. S., & Rose, S. K. (2012). Climate and Energy-Water-Land System Interactions Technical Report to the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. PNNL-21185, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.

FAO. (2010). Bioenergy and food security: the BEFS analysis for Thailand. Environmental and Natural Resources Management Working Paper, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

DEDE. (2014). Energy balance of Thailand: 2012–2014, annual reports. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. (2015). Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP2015). Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

IIASA/FAO. (2012). Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ) version 3.0: model documentation. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

IIASA/FAO. (2012). Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ) version 3.0: user’s guide. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Fischer, G., Hizsnyik, E., Prieler, S., Shah, M., Van Velthuizen, H. (2009). Biofuels and Food security. OFID/IIASA, Vienna.

Hermann, S., Welsch, M., Segerstrom, R., Howells, M., Young, C., Alfstad, T., Rogner, H., Steduto, P. (2012). Climate, land, energy and water (CLEW) interlinkages in Burkina Faso: An analysis of agricultural intensification and bioenergy production. Natural Resources Forum, 36, 245-262.

Ravindranath, N. H., Laksmi, C. S., Manuvie, R., & Balachandra, P. (2011). Biofuel production and implications for land use, food production and environment in India. Energy Policy, 39(10), 5737-5745.

Staples, M., Olcay, H., Malina, R., Trivedi, P., Pearlson, M., Strzepak, K., Paltsev, S., Wollerssheim, C., & Barrett, S. (2013). Water consumption footprint and land requirements of large-scale alternative diesel and jet fuel production. Environment Science and Tecnology, 47, 12557-12565.

Krolczyk, J., Latawiec, A., & Kubon, M. (2014). Sustainable agriculture – the potential to increase yields of wheat and rapeseed in Poland. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 23, 663-672.

Rosenzweig, C., Elliottb, J., Deryngd, D., Ruanea, A., Müllere, C., Arnethf, A., Booteg, K., Folberthh, C., Glotteri, M., Khabarovj, N., Neumannk, K., Pionteke, F., Pughf, T., Schmidm, E., Stehfestk, E., Yangh, H., & Jonesg, J. (2014). Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9), 3268-3273.

SEI. (2012). Long-range Energy Alternative Planning (LEAP) system: training exercises. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.

Sritong, N., Promjiraprawat, K., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2014). CO2 mitigation in the road transport sector in Thailand: Analysis of energy efficiency and bio-energy. Energy Procedia, 52, 131-141.

Kemausuor, F., Nygaard, I., & Mackenzie, G. (2015). Prospects for bioenergy use in Ghana using long-range energy alternatives planning model. Energy, 93, 672-682.

Islas, J., Manzini, F., & Masera, O. (2007). A prospective study of bioenergy use in Mexico. Energy, 32, 2306-2320.

Suganthi, L., & Samuel, AA. (2012). Energy models for demand forecasting—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 1223-1240.

Pagnarith, K., & Limmeechokchai, B. (2009). Biomass and Solar Energy for Rural Electrification and CO2 Mitigation in Cambodia. International Journal of Renewable Energy, 4, 25-34.

FAO. (2011). Example of the use of CROPWAT 8.0. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Gheewala, SH., Silalertruksa, T., Nilsalab, P., Mungkung R., Perret, S.R., & Chaiyawannakarn, N. (2014). Water footprint and impact of water consumption for food, feed, fuel crops production in Thailand. Water, 6, 1698-1718.

Gerbens-Leenes, PW., Van Lienden, AR., Hoekstra, AY., & Van der Meer, TH. (2012). Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: The global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030. Global Environ Change, 22, 764-775.

Surendran, U., Sushanth, CM., Mammen, G., & Joseph, EJ. (2015). Modelling the crop water requirement using FAO-CROPWAT and assessment of water resources for sustainable water resource management: A case study in Palakkad district of humid tropical Kerala, India. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1211-1219.

Fachinelli, NP., & Pereira, AO. (2015). Impacts of sugarcane ethanol production in the Paranaiba basin water resources. Biomass and Bioenergy, 83, 8-16.

Gerbens-Leenes, PW., Hoekstra, AY., Van der Meer, TH. (2009). The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecological Economics, 68, 1052-1060.

MOE. (2013). Thailand Energy Outlook. Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. (2014). Thailand energy situation: 2005–2014, annual reports. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. (2014). Thailand alternative energy situation: 20010–2014, annual reports. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Bangkok.

FAO. (2011). CLIMWAT 2.0 for CROPWAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

TMD. (2012). Mean Annual Rainfall in Thailand (30-year period: 1971–2000). Thai Meteorological Department, Bangkok.

FAO. (2012). Crop yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 66. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

FAO. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirement. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

RID. (2011). Reference crop evapotranspiration by Penman Monteith. Royal Irrigation Department, Bangkok.

OAE. (2014). Major agricultural products situation. Office of Agricultural Economics, Bangkok.

NSO. (2012). Land Use in Thailand, National Statistical Office, Bangkok.

FCRI. (2009). Sugarcane cultivation. Field Crops Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok.

FCRI. (2009). Cassava cultivation. Field Crops Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok.

Thai Ethanol Manufacturing Association. (2013). Production process ethanol. Retrived from http://www.thaiethanol.com/th/2013-04-06-13-53-49/ production-process-ethanol.html.

Nguyen, TL., Gheewala, SH., & Garivait, S. (2008). Full chain energy analysis of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Applied Energy, 85, 722-734.

Nguyen, TL., Gheewala, SH., & Garivait, S. (2007). Full chain energy analysis of fuel ethanol from Cassava in Thailand. Environ Sci Technol, 41(11), 4135-4142.

Yuttitham, M., Gheewala, SH., & Chidthaisong, A. (2011). Carbon footprint of sugar produced from sugarcane in eastern Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 2119-2127.

IPCC. (2000). IPCC special report on emission scenarios. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

OAE. (2015). Thailand’s Agricultural Development Plan and highlight activities on CASP2. Office of Agricultural Economics. The 12th Annual Meeting of the Working Group on Agriculture (WGA-12), Bangkok, Thailand.