Prescriptive-Based Building Regulations: Challenges and Recommendations for Modernization in the Case of Bangkok

Main Article Content

Pornprom Mannontaratana
Vikrom Laovisutthichai
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-7784
Traiwat Viryasiri
Monsicha Jamnothai
Watinee Poonpermpun

Abstract

Prescriptive building codes have long structured urban development by offering rule-based standards that ensure safety, uniformity, and ease of enforcement. Despite widespread reliance on prescriptive codes in developing countries, there is limited empirical evidence guiding their modernization or hybridization. This research investigates the challenges of prescriptive-based building regulations in the context of Bangkok, Thailand, and explores pathways toward more effective and modernized regulatory frameworks. Through regulatory review, focus groups, and public discussions with professionals, government officials, and private sectors, the study identifies four core problems: complexity, inconsistency, redundancy, and obsolescence. It then proposes a hybrid approach that improves existing prescriptive systems while integrating performance-based elements to enhance regulatory flexibility, clarity, and efficiency. Key recommendations include simplifying legal structures, ensuring regular updates, resolving overlapping provisions, and introducing visual legal tools and digital platforms. The findings contribute to both academic and practical discussions, serving as a foundational reference for regulatory reform, particularly in developing urban contexts where institutional capacities and resources may vary. Future studies are recommended to test proposed reforms empirically and explore their applicability in diverse legal and administrative settings.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mannontaratana, P., Laovisutthichai, V., Viryasiri, T., Jamnothai, M., & Poonpermpun, W. (2025). Prescriptive-Based Building Regulations: Challenges and Recommendations for Modernization in the Case of Bangkok. Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 24(3), Article 519. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202524519
Section
Research Articles

References

Ainuddin, S., Mukhtar, U., & Ainuddin, S. (2014). Public perception about enforcement of building codes as risk reduction strategy for seismic safety in Quetta, Baluchistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 9, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.04.007

Bikdeli, S. (2025). Investigation of the key factors influencing the urban building code violations in Mashhad, Northeastern Iran (2002–2022). City, Territory and Architecture, 12(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-025-00256-w

Boverket, B. (2019). Boverket’s building regulations, BBR18 - (BFS 2011:26). Global Building Performance Network. https://library.gbpn.org/library/bc-detail-pages/sweden

Chantrarat, N. (2020). Panha lae uppasak nai kan bang khap chai phraratchabanyat khuapkhum akhan Pho.So. songphanharoiyisipsong suksa ko̜rani kankosang akhan mai trong tam baep thi dai rap anuyat chak chaophanakngan thongthin sung dai rongrian to phu truatkan phaendin [Enforcement Challenges of the Building Control Act B.E. 2522: A Case Study of Non-Compliance with Approved Construction Plans Based on Local Officials' Complaints to the Ombudsman]. Office of Ombudsman. https://ombstudies.ombudsman.go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=1420&filename=index

Chow, W. K. (2015). Performance-based approach to determining fire safety provisions for buildings in the Asia-Oceania regions. Building and Environment, 91, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.007

Chullabodhi, C., Chalermpong, S., & Ratanawaraha, A. (2022). Examining the root causes of on-street parking mismanagement in Central Bangkok. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(1), Article 207. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202221207

Dandy, E. (2019). A perspective on key legal considerations for performance-base regulating. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 103, 7–36. https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-12/nlb103.pdf#page=9

Dixit, A. M. O. D., & Esteban, L. E. O. N. (2009). Safer building codes and construction: A strategy for enforcement, implementation and dissemination. Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/globalplatform/2009/programme/special-events/v.php%3Fid=44.html

Duncan, J. (2005). Performance-based building: Lessons from implementation in New Zealand. Building Research & Information, 33(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210412331313007

Fauth, J., Pasetti Monizza, G., & Malacarne, G. (2023). Understanding processes on digital building permits–a case study in South Tyrol. Building Research & Information, 51(5), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2178372

Fakunle, F., Opiti, C., Sheikh, A., & Fashina, A. (2020). Major barriers to the enforcement and violation of building codes and regulations: a global perspective. SPC Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.14419/jes.v2i1.30371

Green Building Consulting & Engineering. (2024). Sustainable development: Demystifying the costs of green construction. https://www.greendesignconsulting.com/single-post/sustainable-development-demystifying-the-costs-of-green-construction

Honjo, Y., Kikuchi, Y., & Shirato, M. (2010). Development of the design codes grounded on the performance-based design concept in Japan. Soils and foundations, 50(6), 983–1000. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.983

Kelly, L. M., & Cordeiro, M. (2020). Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes. Methodological innovations, 13(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120937242

Kosump, M. (2011). Problems and obstructions on the enforcements of the Building Control Act B.E. 2522 of local officers [Master's thesis, Sripatum University]. https://dspace.spu.ac.th/handle/123456789/3706

Laovisutthichai, V., Lu, W., & Low, S. P. (2025a). Design for excellence (DfX) for high-rise modular buildings: from DfX considerations to module design guidelines using the case of Hong Kong. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 21(3), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2024.2390964

Laovisutthichai, V., Viryasiri, T., Low, S. P., Sangnin, K., Kramomtong, W., & Panjapiyakul, N. (2025b). Collaborative architecture, engineering, construction, and operations (AECO) practice model for healthcare facilities in Thailand. International Journal of Construction Management, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2546014

Li, B. & Yao R. (2012). Building energy efficiency for sustainable development in China: Challenges and opportunities. Building Research and Information, 40(4), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.682419

Li, J., & Shui, B. (2015). A comprehensive analysis of building energy efficiency policies in China: Status quo and development perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.061

Loveridge, R. (2007). Building regulation: From prescription to performance. Design and Construction (pp. 126–145). Routledge.

May, P. J. (2003). Performance‐based regulation and regulatory regimes: The saga of leaky buildings. Law & policy, 25(4), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-8240.2003.00155.x

May, P. J. (2015). Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3-4), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714561505

McLean, I. (2004). The history of regulation in the United Kingdom: Three case studies in search of a theory. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The politics of regulation (pp. 45–66). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420673.00012

Meacham, B., Bowen, R., Traw, J., & Moore, A. (2005). Performance-based building regulation: Current situation and future needs. Building Research & Information, 33(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000322780

Meacham, B. J. (2010). Accommodating innovation in building regulation: Lessons and challenges. Building Research & Information, 38(6), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2010.505380

Meacham, B. J. (2016). Toward next generation performance-based building regulatory systems. Building Research & Information, 45(5), 540–551.

Meacham, B. J., & van Straalen, I. J. (2018). A socio-technical system framework for risk-informed performance-based building regulation. Building research & information, 46(4), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1299525

Meacham, B. J. (2019). Sustainability and resiliency objectives in performance building regulations. Building Governance and Climate Change (pp. 8–23). Routledge.

Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of case study research. Sage publications.

Mjörnell, K., Boss, A., Lindahl, M., & Molnar, S. (2014). A tool to evaluate different renovation alternatives with regard to sustainability. Sustainability, 6(7), 4227–4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074227

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733

Neuendorf, K. A. (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 211–223). Routledge.

Nwadike, A. N., & Wilkinson, S. (2021). Building code amendment and building resilience: Perspective of building code users in New Zealand. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2020-0020

Oster, S. M., & Quigley, J. M. (1977). Regulatory barriers to the diffusion of innovation: Some evidence from building codes. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(2)3, 361–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003292ii

Pinich, S., Srimuang, K., & Sreshthaputra, A. (2023). Optimization of envelope heat gain and interior daylight illuminance in building facade design under reflectance limitations: A case study of office buildings in Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 22(3), Article 317. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202322317

Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2138392

Shapiro, S. (2016). The realpolitik of building codes: Overcoming practical limitations to climate resilience. Building research & information, 44(5-6), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156957

Takeichi, N., Hagiwara, I., Kazunori, H., Tsujimoto, M., & Takahashi, W. (2003). Performance-based provisions for fire safety in the Japanese Building Standard Law: How to connect regulation and engineering. Fire Safety Science, 7, 777–788. http://dx.doi.org/10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.7-777

Viryasiri, T., Laovisutthichai, V., Sangnin, K., Dhanakoses, K., Roopkaew, P., & Viryasiri, P. (2024). Hospital design principles implementation: Reflections from practitioners in Thailand. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 23(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2215842

Visscher, H., & Meijer, F. (2007, June). Dynamics of building regulations in Europe. ENHR 2007 international conference on sustainable urban areas (pp. 25–28). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228501417_Dynamics_of_building_regulations_in_Europe

World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021. https://wdr2021.worldbank.org/the-report/opment Report 2021. https://wdr2021.worldbank.org/the-report/