Login or Register to make a submission.

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • 1. I have read the About the Journal page for the Journal’s submission policies and the Editorial Manager: Tutorial for Authors on Aries Systems website for the steps in registration, log in, submission, and tracking your submission processes.
  • 2. I attest that this manuscript is not currently being considered by other journals (or conference proceedings) nor has it been published elsewhere in English and other languages.
  • 3. I have read and agree to follow the Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning (NJEDP) Author Guidelines.
  • 4. I agree with the Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing follow the the Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning (NJEDP) Author Guidelines.
  • 5. I verify that if this manuscript describes a study wherein humans or animals were subjects, the treatment of those subjects was in accordance with established ethical guidelines and appropriate institutional approval has been obtained.
  • 6. This manuscript has been prepared consistent with APA Publication Manual guidelines.
  • 7. I have included the names and contact information of all authors in a previous submission step. Inclusion of such information indicates that these individuals have agreed to be an author.
  • 8. I understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process. I am responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs.
  • 9. I have obtained permission to reproduce or adapt any copyrighted material from other sources and am able to provide documentation for this permission.
  • 10. I agree to comply with APA Ethics Code Standard 8.14a, Sharing Research Data for Verification, allowing other qualified professionals to confirm the analyses and results should my manuscript be accepted for publication. Per APA guidelines I will retain raw data for a minimum of 5 years after publication of the research.
  • 11. If my manuscript is accepted for publication, I agree to transfer copyright to Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning (NJEDP) full and exclusive rights to the manuscript, all revisions, and the full copyright.
  • 12. I have been informed that Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning (NJEDP) is an open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed journal.
  • 13. If this submission funded by a grant, I have included the grant information in the acknowledgement.
  • 14. I verify that the submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format and URLs for the references are provided, where available.
  • 15. I have included a graphical abstract according the Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning (NJEDP) Author Guidelines.
  • 16. I verify that the word count of the manuscript is in the range of 6,000-8,000 words and the abstract is no more than 250 words and that the article format follow the journal template as found on the link
    https://drive.google.com/drive/u/3/folders/1yD1r636fNP7Tj03S_jR147dv69_RTkKO

https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakhara/author_guidelines 

Additional Information after October 2025

 

  • ORCHID
    All authors of a manuscript must include their full names, affiliation and ORCiDs (https://orchid.org/). 

 

  • Graphical Abstract
    You are encouraged to provide a graphical abstract at submission.

    The graphical abstract should summarize the contents of your article in a concise, pictorial form which is designed to capture the attention of a wide readership. A graphical abstract will help draw more attention to your online article and support readers in digesting your research. Some guidelines:

    Submit your graphical abstract as a separate file in the online submission system.
    Ensure the image is a minimum of 531 x 1328 pixels (h x w) or proportionally more and is readable at a size of 5 x 13 cm using a regular screen resolution of 96 dpi.

    Our preferred file types for graphical abstracts are TIFF, EPS, PDF or MS Office files.

    We encourage you to view example graphical abstracts and read about the benefits of including them.

 

  • Author Contribution
    Sutee Anantsuksomsri: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software. Apiparn Borisuit: Data curation, Writing- Original draft preparation. Runda Aduldejcharas: Visualization, Investigation. 

  • Human Subjects
    If the study is concerned with human subjects, the author(s) must provide report of results from the human subjects including interviews, surveys, or experiments that requires an ethics statement as supplementary of the manuscript. Preferably, the Institutional Review Board approval number for your project should be provided. An example statement might be: “The study approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of NAME OF INSTITUTE (protocol code XXX and date of approval).” Alternatively, you should document that all participants are anonymous, participation was entirely voluntary, and the methods followed the Helsinki principles for human subjects. An example statement might be: “All research procedures involving human participants were done in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Participation in the study was voluntary and informed consent was obtained for all research components that involved human participants, in accordance with standard ethical practice.” If your study did not include human subjects, the statement is not necessary.

 

  • Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing
    Authors must declare the use of generative AI in scientific writing upon submission of the paper. The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:

 

  • Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies should only be used in the writing process to improve the readability and language of the manuscript.

 

  • The technology must be applied with human oversight and control and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased. Authors are ultimately responsible and accountable for the contents of the work.

 

  • Authors must not list or cite AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author on the manuscript since authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.

    The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing must be declared by adding a statement at the end of the manuscript when the paper is first submitted. The statement will appear in the published work and should be placed in a new section before the references list. An example:

 

  • Title of new section: Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.

 

  • Statement: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the published article.

    The declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools, such as tools used to check grammar, spelling and references. If you have nothing to disclose, you do not need to add a statement.


Please note: to protect authors’ rights and the confidentiality of their research, this journal does not currently allow the use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies such as ChatGPT or similar services by reviewers or editors in the peer review and manuscript evaluation process.