Tradition and Modernity: The Adaptation of Outdoor Spaces in Traditional Balinese Dwelling
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the dialectical relation between tradition and current everyday domestic practices in traditional Balinese dwellings that manifest through the spatial adaptation of their outdoor spaces. Traditional Balinese dwellings consist of a compound collection of partly open pavilions surrounded by open spaces, following the symbolic classification of Balinese cosmology, Sanga Mandala. Dwelling adaptation becomes necessary to enable the support of the changing household needs throughout time, aiming to capture a process that emerges in the current traditional dwellings bounded by a particular cultural order. This study focuses on the spatial adaptation strategies of the outdoor spaces as a response to their changing livelihood. Observation and documentation were done at a Balinese traditional dwelling in Batuan Village, Gianyar, identifying the changes in dwelling arrangement through spatial practices happening in the local families. The study maps the traces of objects and transient areas in the central and in-between spaces around the pavilions. The study highlights conditions that drive the critical dialogue between tradition and current everyday practice, such as the growth of family members, the differing livelihoods across generations, and the need to balance between everyday occupation and ritual events. This dialogue has led to permanent, temporary, and incremental adaptation strategies of the outdoor spaces, creating layers of spatial ordering that demonstrate how architecture adapts and evolves instead of being frozen in time. Such findings contribute to the discussion of adaptation in the traditional domestic context that is informed by an in-depth connection with its locality.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aboualy, S., Mansour, Y., & El-Fiki, S. (2023). Transformations and appropriations of the in-between spaces in Cairo. Open House International, 48(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-07-2021-0135
Al-Mohannadi, A., Furlan, R., & Grosvald, M. (2023). Women’s spaces in the vernacular Qatari courtyard house: How privacy and gendered spatial segregation shape architectural identity. Open House International, 48(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-01-2022-0011
Ali Sargazi, M., & Tahbaz, M. (2022). Effects of climate responsive strategies and adaptive behavior of occupants on thermal comfort in indoor environments of vernacular architecture: A review of necessities and goals. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(2), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202221210
Andres, L., & Kraftl, P. (2021). New directions in the theorisation of temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation and trajectory. Progress in Human Geography, 45(5), 1237–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520985321
Aranha, J. L. (1991). A comparison of traditional settlements in Nepal and Bali. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 2(2), 35–47.
Ardhyanto, A., & Dewancker, B. (2019, October). Vernacular architecture transformations of coastal Labuan Bajo [Paper presentation]. The 1st Academic Forum on Future of Coastal Cities Conference, Qingdao, China.
Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Penguin.
Faisal, G., & Wihardyanto, D. (2020). Negotiations of vernacular shapes and materials of Talang Mamak Tribal houses, East Sumatra, Indonesia. ISVS E-Journal, 7(3), 14–26. https://isvshome.com/pdf/ISVS_7-3/ISVS_ej_7.3.2_Gun_Faisal_Final.pdf
Geertz, H. (2004). Life of a Balinese temple: Artistry, imagination, and history in a peasant village. University of Hawaii Press.
Gelebet, I. N., Meganada, I. N., Negara, I. M. Y., Suwirya, I. M., & Surata, I. N. (1981). Arsitektur tradisional daerah Bali [Traditional architecture in Bali] (I. G. N. A. Puja, Ed.). Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Department of Education and Culture].
Gunawan, Y. (2019). Lessons from Joglo’s tectonic adaptability for sustainable future. Creative Space, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15415/cs.2019.62009
Hertzberger, H. (2013). Space and the architect: Lessons for students in architecture 2 (Reprint edition). Nai010 Publishers.
Karimah, A., & Paramita, K. D. (2020). Investigating the domestic layers adaptation during pandemic. Interiority, 3(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v3i2.101
Kronenburg, R. (2002). Houses in motion: The genesis, history, and development of the portable building (2nd ed). Wiley-Academy.
Lawrence, R. J. (1984). Transition spaces and dwelling design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1(4), 261–271.
Leu, L., & Boonyaputthipong, C. (2023). A study of shading devices in modern architecture for the hot humid climate of Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 22(1), Article 301. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202322301
Li, Y., Meng, X., Zhao, H., Li, W., & Long, Y. (2023). Identifying abandoned buildings in shrinking cities with mobile sensing images. Urban Informatics, 2(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-023-00025-5
Luz, A. (2006). Places in-between: The transit(ional) locations of Nomadic narratives. In E. Naripea, V. Sarapik, & J. Tomberg (Eds.), Place and location V – Studies in environmental aesthetics and semiotics V. The Research Group of Cultural and Literary Theory, Estonian Literary Museum. https://nyydiskultuur.artun.ee/en/books/place-and-location/place-and-location-v/
Naing, N., & Hadi, K. (2020). Vernacular architecture of Buginese: The concept of local-wisdom in constructing buildings based on human anatomy. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.8.3_1
Ng, V., & Lim, J. P. (2018). Tracing liminality: A multidisciplinary spatial construct. Journal of Engineering Architecture, 6(1), 76–90. https://www.academia.edu/77047684/Tracing_Liminality_A_Multidisciplinary_Spatial_Construct
Oliver, P. (1997). Encyclopedia of vernacular architecture of the world: Cultures and habitats. Cambridge University Press.
Paramita, K. D., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2024). Cohabitation of people and animals in vernacular settlements: Insight from Indonesian villages. Proceedings of International Seminar on Vernacular Settlement 12 Vernacular Built Environments: Towards a Sustainable Future (pp. 448–464). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378653885_Cohabitation_of_people_and_animals_in_vernacular_settlements_Insight_from_Indonesian_villages
Santos-Garcia, A., & Braga, I. A. (2025). In-between spaces for today’s city: Historical review for identifying their beneficial characteristics. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 14(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.06.011
Schmidt III, R., & Austin, S. (2016). Adaptable architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722931
Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2005). Flexible housing: Opportunities and limits. Arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 9(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135505000199
Setiadi, A., & Gharata, V. D. (2022). The influence of tourism on settlement patterns in a traditional village in Bali, Indonesia. ISVS E-Journal, 9(1), 75-84. https://isvshome.com/pdf/ISVS_9-1/ISVS_9.1.7_Amos_Final.pdf
Smithson, P., & Smithson, S. (2017). Alison and Peter Smithson: The Space Between (M. Risselada, Ed.). Walther König, Köln.
Suarya, I. M. (2003). Peranan natah di dalam kehidupan masyarakat Bali [The role of natah in the livelihood of Balinese community]. Jurnal Natah, 1(1), 1–7. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/natah/article/view/2928
Suartika, G. A. M. (2018). Global and domestic spheres: Impact on the traditional settlement of Penglipuran in Bali. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 123, Article 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/123/1/012014
Suhada S. K., & Lukito Y. N. (2022). The dynamics of kitchen adaptation based on the cultural spatial system in Minangkabau, West Sumatra. Evergreen, 9(4), 1203–1209. https://hdl.handle.net/2324/6625730
Suryantini, R., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2024). Multiplicity as spatial strategy of a shared domestic outdoor space. AIP Conference Proceeding, 3215(1), Article 050007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0236806
Suryantini, R., Paramita, K. D., & Ren, X. (2024). Making food: Exploring the indigenous resilience strategy of the Bima communities in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Proceedings of International Seminar on Vernacular Settlement 12 Vernacular Built Environments: Towards a Sustainable Future (pp. 430–447). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378102158_Making_Food_Exploring_the_Indigenous_Resilience_Strategy_of_the_Bima_Communities_in_West_Nusa_Tenggara_Indonesia
Suryantini, R., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2023a). Toward a healthy home: Investigating food flow and the shift in domestic spatial practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Housing and Society, 50(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2021.1928854
Suryantini, R., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2023b). The story of finding food: Adaptation of sampan as living and working space in Riau Islands, Indonesia. ISVS E-Journal, 10(6), 38–50. https://isvshome.com/pdf/ISVS_10-6/ISVSej_10.6.4.pdf
Suryantini, R., Paramita, K. D., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2021). A healthy machine for living: Investigating the fluidity of open spaces in the domestic environment during the pandemic. AIP Conference Proceeding, 2376, Article 040018. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0063938
Tan, G. (2011). The open and adaptive tradition: Applying the concepts of open building and multi-purpose design in traditional Chinese vernacular architecture. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 10(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.10.7
Tang, X. (2014). Three adaptabilities of the traditional vernacular architecture of the Han nationality in Lingnan. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 644–650, 5109–5112. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.644-650.5109
Tzortzi, J. N., & Saxena, I. (2024). Threshold spaces: The transitional spaces between outside and inside in traditional Indian dwellings. Heritage, 7(12), 6683–6711. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7120309
Tsoumpri, D. (2023). Architectural space as an open, adaptable system: A design experiment. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 21(4), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231162382
van Ellen, L. A., Bridgens, B. N., Burford, N., & Heidrich, O. (2021). Rhythmic buildings- a framework for sustainable adaptable architecture. Building and Environment, 203, Article 108068-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108068
Wahid, A. R., Paramita, K. D., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2021). Inscriptions: Narrating the spatial dynamics of the immaterial interior. Interiority, 4(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v4i1.87
Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Paramita, K. D. (2017). Topological reading of movement connectivity in sensory integration space for autistic children. Space and Culture, 20(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331216646060
Yudantini, N. M. (2012). Natah and Telajakan: The role and identity in indigenous villages. Proceedings of International Seminar on Place Making and Identity (pp. 179–187). Academia. https://www.academia.edu/12738984/NATAH_AND_TELAJAKAN_THE_ROLE_AND_IDENTITY_IN_INDIGENOUS_VILLAGES#loswp-work-container
Zhao, X., & Greenop, K. (2019). From ‘neo-vernacular’ to ‘semi-vernacular’: A case study of vernacular architecture representation and adaptation in rural Chinese village revitalization. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(11), 1128–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1570544