Mixed-use Developments and Urban Megaprojects in the Global South: A Systematic Review and Interpretation of a Blurred Intersection
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the intersection of two distinct strains of urban studies: mixed-use development and urban megaprojects, through a systematic review of literature. One strain focuses on integrating diverse uses and functions within a single space, known as 'mixed-use'. The other originates from the technical complexities of megaprojects adapted to architecture and urban design. The article seeks to address a gap in the literature by clarifying the conceptual yet geographical overlaps between these two strains, which often have broad, blurred boundaries; it proposes a novel framework for defining and interpreting the related literature at this conceptual intersection.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Acero, J. A., Koh, E. J. Y., Ruefenacht, L. A., & Norford, L. K. (2021). Modelling the influence of high-rise urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort in Singapore. Urban Climate, 36, Art5icle 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100775
Addae-Dapaah, K. (2005). Highest and best use in the valuation of mixed-use development sites: A linear programming approach. Journal of Property Research, 22(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599910500411028
Adityanandana, M., & Gerber J. F. (2019). Post-growth in the Tropics? Contestations over Tri Hita Karana and a tourism megaproject in Bali. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(12), 1839–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1666857
Altshuler, A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: the changing politics of urban public investment. Brooking Institute Press.
Association of Southeast Asian Nations Secretariat. (2018). ASEAN sustainable urbanisation strategy. https://asean.org/book/asean-sustainable-urbanisation-strategy/
Association of Southeast Asian Nations Secretariat. (2022a). ASEAN sustainable urbanisation report. https://asean.org/book/asean-sustainable-urbanisation-report/
Association of Southeast Asian Nations Secretariat. (2022b). ASEAN leader statement on the application of Timor-Leste for ASEAN membership. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/05-ASEAN-Leaders-Statement-on-the-Application-of-Timor-Leste-for-ASEAN-Membership.pdf
Avery, E., & Moser, S. (2023). Urban speculation for survival: Adaptations and negotiations in Forest City, Malaysia. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221121797
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bagaeen, S. (2007). Brand Dubai: The instant city; or the instantly recognizable city. International Planning Studies, 12(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701486372
Berawi, M. A., Affiandi, Z. N., Miraj, P., & Gunawan, G. (2019). Financial and institutional scheme of aerotropolis conceptual design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 650, Article 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/650/1/012005
Bovensiepen, J., & Meitzner-Yoder, L. S. (2018). Introduction: The political dynamics and social effects of megaproject development. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 19(5), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2018.1513553
Damayanti, R., Hartono, B., & Wijaya, A. R. (2018, 16-19 December). The complexity of megaprojects in developing countries: A literature review [Paper presentation]. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607707
Damayanti, R., Hartono, B., & Wijaya, A. (2021). Complexity, leadership, and megaproject performance: A configuration analysis. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 14(3), 570–603. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.3476
Demdoum, K. E., Yunos, Y. M., Ujang, N., & Utaberta, N. (2024). Systematic review of built environment attributes of walkability: Cases of Malaysia. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 23(2), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202423410
Denicol, J., Davies, A., & Krystallis, I. (2020). What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance? A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project Management Journal, 51(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819896113
Denpaiboon, C., Panitchpakdi, K., Kanegae, H., Selanon, P., & Boonnun, Y. (2018). Influences of urban infrastructure development on urban forms and lifestyle of greater Bangkok. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 14, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ20181495110
Dick, H. W., & Rimmer, P. (1998). Beyond the third world city: The new urban geography of South-East Asia. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2303–2321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983890
Douglass, M. (2002). From global intercity competition to cooperation for livable cities and economic resilience in Pacific Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780201400105
Fainstein, S. (2001). The city builders: Property development in New York and London, 1980-2000. University Press of Kansas.
Fainstein, S. (2008). Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00826.x
Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk, an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Mega projects, policy, and planning. University of Aalborg.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409
Gao, T., & Lim, S. (2023). Socio-spatial integration in innovation districts: Singapore's mixed-use experiment. Cities, 140, Article 104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104405
Generalova, E., & Generalov, V. (2020). Mixed-use high-rise buildings: A typology of the future. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 753, Article 022062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/753/2/022062
Gopalakrishnan, S., Sinthalapadi Srikanth, A. D., Hablani, C., & Schroepfer, T. (2022, 13–16 September). Measuring impacts of vertically integrated pedestrian network configurations on urban space use in dense built environments. Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2022) - Volume 2, Ghent. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2022.2.307
Grubbauer, M., & Camprag, N. (2019). Urban megaprojects, nation-state politics and regulatory capitalism in central and eastern Europe: The Belgrade Waterfront project. Urban Studies, 56(4), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018757663
Hawken, S., Avazpour, B., Harris, M. S., Marzban, A., & Munro, P. G. (2021). Urban megaprojects and water justice in Southeast Asia: Between global economies and community transitions. Cities, 113, Article 103068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103068
Hanakata, N. C., & Gasco, A. (2018). The Grand Projet politics of an urban age: urban megaprojects in Asia and Europe. Palgrave Communications, 4, Article 86. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0141-5
Harms, E. (2015). Porous enclaves: Blurred boundaries and incomplete exclusion in South East Asian cities. South East Asia Research, 23(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2015.0255
He, Y., & Tritto, A. (2022). Urban utopia or pipe dream? Examining Chinese-invested smart city development in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 43(9), 2244–2268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2089648
Hu, Y., Chan, A. P. C., Le, Y., & Jin, R. (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(4), Article 04014055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000212
Hübscher, M. (2021). Megaprojects, gentrification, and tourism. A systematic review on intertwined phenomena. Sustainability, 13(22), Article 12827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212827
Huynh, D. (2015). Phu My Hung new urban development in Ho Chi Minh city: Only a partial success of a broader landscape. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.03.005
Issarathumnoon, W. (2022). Understanding the dynamic creative clustering in the Phra Athit Road area of Bangkok. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(3), Article 220. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202221220
Jajamovich, G., & Kozak, D. (2019). Urban megaprojects. In A. Orum (Ed.). The wiley blackwell encyclopedia of urban and regional studies (pp. 2425–2427). Wiley.
Janpathompong, S., Tontisirin, N., & Murakami, A. (2022). How far people walk during lunchtime: Comparing actual and perceived walking distances in the central business district of Bangkok, Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(3), Article 227. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202221227
Jhearmaneechotechai, P. (2022). Selection criteria of ordinary urban heritages through the case of Bangrak, a multi-cultural & old commercial district of Bangkok. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(2), Article 209. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202221209
Kim, M. (2023). Taking stock of what we know about large- scale urban development projects: A review of existing theoretical frameworks and case studies. Journal of Planning Literature, 38(2), 171–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08854122221097976
Kleibert, J. M., & Kippers, L. (2015). Living the good life? The rise of urban mixed-use enclaves in Metro Manila. Urban Geography, 37(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1082799
Kleibert, J. M. (2018). Exclusive development(s): Special economic zones and enclave urbanism in the Philippines. Association for Critical Sociology, 44(3), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517698538
Lehrer, U., & Laidley, J. (2008). Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 786–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x
Marshall, R. (1998). Kuala Lumpur: Competition and the quest for World City status. Built Environment, 24(4), 271–279.
McGrath, B. (2006). Modernities and memories in Bangkok. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 1, 25–40. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakhara/article/view/102621
McNeill, D. (2022). Botanic urbanism: The technopolitics of controlled environments in Singapore’s Gardens by the Bay. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13075
Metrau, E., Young, K. E., & Eapen, S. G. (2024, 1 July). World Bank country classifications by income level for 2024–2025. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/world-bank-country-classifications-by-income-level-for-2024-2025
Moulaert, F., Rodriguez, A., & Swyngedouw, E. (2003). The globalized city: Economic restructuring and social polarization in European Cities. Oxford University Press.
Olds, K. (1995). Globalization and the production of new urban spaces: Pacific Rim megaprojects in the late 20th century. Environment and Planning A, 27(1), 1713–1743. https://doi.org/10.1068/a271713
Omar, D. B. (2004). The total planning doctrine and putrajaya development. In N. Marchettini, C. A. Brebbia, E. Tiezzi, & L. C. Wadhwa (Eds.). The sustainable city III (pp. 81–90). WIT Press.
Ong, A. (2011). Introduction: Worlding cities, or the art of being global. In A. Roy, & A. Ong (Eds.). Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 1–26). Wiley-Blackwell.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. (2021b). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article 160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Paramita, A. A., Winarso, H., Hudalah, D., Syabri, I. (2023). Path dependency and development impacts of megaproject: A case study of North Jakarta Bay Reclamation. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(11), 3477–3490. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181113
Permanasari, E., & Sintusingha, S. (2021). The production of megaprojects in Java: Colonialism, nationalism, development centralisation vs decentralisation. In S. Sintusingha, H. Wu, W. Lin, S. S. Han, & B. Qin (Eds.). International perspectives on the belt and road initiative - A bottom-up approach (pp. 191–206). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367854645-11
Prasetyo, A., Mursitama T. N., Simatupang B., & Furinto, A. (2022). Enhancing mega project resilience through capability development in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 14(3), 1–21. https:// doi.org/10.34111/ijefs.20220060
Pratama, I. P. P., Winarso, H., Hudalah, D., & Syabri, I. (2023). Social relations in megaproject planning: Exploring the roles of local government in the development of Indonesia’s special economic zones. Town Planning Review, 94(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2023.10
Rabianski, J., Gibler, K., Tidwell, O. A., & Clements III, J. S. (2009). Mixed-use development: A call for research. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 17(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2009.12090251
Rapoport, E., & Hult A. (2017). The travelling business of sustainable urbanism: International consultants as norm-setters, Environment and Planning A, 49(8), 1779–1796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16686069
Rek-Woźniak, M. (2023). Discourses of growth in megaproject-based urban development: A comparative study of Poland and Finland. Policy and Society, 42(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad008
Rizzo, A. (2020). Megaprojects and the limits of ‘green resilience’ in the global South: Two cases from Malaysia and Qatar. Urban Studies, 57(7), 1520–1535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018812009
Setiadi, D. F. P, Nurcahyo, R., & Farizal, F. (2021, March 7–11). Critical success factors during execution of EPCC national strategic project in Indonesia [Paper presentation]. 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore. https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210115
Shatkin, G. (2008). The city and the bottom line: Urban megaprojects and the privatization of planning in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(2), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38439
Shatkin, G. (2011). Planning privatopolis: Representation and contestation in the development of urban integrated mega-projects. In A. Roy, & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding Cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. Wiley.
Shatkin, G. (2017). Cities for profit: The real estate turn in Asia's urban politics. Cornell University Press.
Sinthalapadi Srikanth, A. D., Wei Chien, B. C., Schroepfer, T., & Bouffanais, R. (2022). Complexity science-based spatial performance analyses of UNStudio/DP Architects’ SUTD Campus and WOHA's Kampung Admiralty. In I. As, P. Basu, & P. Talwar (Eds.). Artificial intelligence in urban planning and design – technologies, implementation, and impacts. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823941-4.00019-6
Stefano, G., Denicol, J., Broyd, T., & Davies, A. (2023). What are the strategies to manage megaproject supply chains? A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Project Management, 41(3), Article 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102457
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00254
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2003). The world in a grain of sand: Large-scale urban development projects and the dynamics of ‘glocal' transformations. In F. Moulaert, A. Rodriguez, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.). The globalized city – economic restructuring and social polarization in European cities (pp. 9–28). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199260409.003.0002
Talen, E. (2023). The scale of urbanism. Urban Science, 7(3), Article 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7030087
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C. … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Urban Land Institute. (1987). Mixed use developments handbooks. Urban Land Institute.
United Nations Human Settlements Program (UN-Habitat). (2016). Sustainable urbanization in Asia: A sourcebook for local governments. https://unhabitat.org/sustainable-urbanization-in-asia
United Nations Statistic Devision. (2021). Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49 standards). https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
United Nations Statistic Devision. (2022). Classification of developed and developing regions - historical and updated. https://unstat-s.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/historical-classification-of-developed-and-developing-regions.xlsx
Wade, M. (2019). Hyper-planning Jakarta: The Great Garuda and planning the global spectacle. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12262
Wang, D., Fang, S., & Fu, H. (2019). Impact of Control and Trust on Megaproject Success: The Mediating Role of Social Exchange Norms. Advances in Civil Engineering, 1(1), Article 4850921. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4850921
Wells, T., & Lamb, V. (2022). The imaginary of a modern city: Post-politics and Myanmar’s urban development. Urban Studies, 59(14), 2875–2892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211044006
World Bank. (n/a). The World Bank atlas method - detailed methodology. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/378832-what-is-the-world-bank-atlas-method
World Bank. (2024). Country classification - World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups?_gl=1*14vwg4q*_gcl_au*NDA0NTMyOTY1LjE3MjMxODI2ODk .
Yassin, A. B. M., Bond, S., & McDonagh, J. (2011). Developing guidelines for riverfront developments for Malaysia. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 17(4), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2011.11104340
Yehia, M. (2022). Interplay of actors and dynamics in urban development projects: A french experience on the west side of Paris. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(5A), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.101405
Yun, H. Y., Kim, J., & Ho, K. C. (2022). Spatial capital, cultural consumption and expatriate neighbourhoods in Hanoi, Vietnam. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 63(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12363
Zakaria, Z., Ismail, S., Rani, W. N. M. W. M., Amat, R. C., & Wahab, M. H. (2018). Fire hazard assessment during construction of a mixed-use development project in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.9), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.9.15262
Zeković, S., Maričić, T., & Vujošević, M. (2018). Megaprojects as an instrument of urban planning and development: Example of Belgrade Waterfront. In S. Hostettler, S. Najih Besson, & J. C. Bolay (Eds). Technologies for development (UNESCO 2016) (pp. 221–232). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91068-0_13