Conserving Thailand's Wooden Built Heritage: Developments, Approaches, and Current Challenges
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated the developments and current status of stakeholders involved in preserving wooden heritage in Thailand, specifically from the government, private sectors, and academia. The methodologies consisted of documentary analyses, in-depth interviews, and on-site observations of wooden conservation sites.
The findings revealed three periods in the development of wooden built heritage: government-led building registration, the evolution of conservation approaches by various stakeholders including private and academic entities, and a collaborative phase emphasizing intangible aspects such as craftsmanship. The study examined current wooden conservation approaches, expanding from traditional methods applied in registered buildings to contemporary and flexible conservation approaches in non-registered buildings. In the non-registered building type within the private sector, there was a need to assess multidimensional aspects beyond cultural values. The results also highlighted several challenges in the preservation of wooden built heritage in Thai context. Firstly, there was the issue of wood resource management. Secondly, the challenge arose in conservation mechanisms such as analyzing drawings, conducting proper surveys, and maintaining carpenter skills. Lastly, the challenge was also encountered in the maintenance of wooden built heritage.
The study recommended conservation support for the private sector, addressing their lack of regulatory protection. Firstly, it proposed the implementation of flexible policies or regulations that are specifically designed for wooden heritage. Secondly, the study suggested establishing supportive information platforms dedicated to wood-related knowledge. Lastly, it emphasized the importance of raising public awareness in preserving wooden built heritage.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Act on Ancient Monuments, Antiques, Objects of Art and National Museums 1934 (12 May, 1935). Government Gazette, 52, 394–414. https://parliamentmuseum.go.th/2564/archaeological_site_law.pdf
Agency for Cultural Affairs. (2018). Policy of cultural affairs in Japan. Bunka. https://www.bunka.go.jp/english/report/annual/pdf/r1394357_01.pdf
Ahmer, C. (2020). Riegl’s ‘modern cult of monuments’ as a theory underpinning practical conservation and restoration work. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 26(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2020.1738727
Angsananont, A. (2022). Mrigadayavan Palace. Thaipost. Retrieved July 12, 2023, from https://www.thaipost.net/columnist-people/58718
Announcement of the Fine Arts Department regarding the list of archaeological sites in the Bangkok area no.2 (2023, June 23). Government Gazette, 140, Special part 149 D, 16–24. https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/140D149S0000000001600.pdf
Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO. (2023). ACCU group training course 2023. https://www.nara.accu.or.jp/english/news1s.php?id=20230410143034
Boonprasong, P. (2021). Attachment and associational dimensions in the architecture of historical building conversion in Thailand between 1997 and 2012. Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 20(1), Article 102. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202120102
Commercial Insurance. (2019). How many privately owned listed buildings are there in the UK? Insurancechoice. https://www.insurancechoice.co.uk/blog/2019/10/how-many-privately-owned-listed-buildings-are-there-in-the-uk
Fine Arts Department. (2018). Kho̜mun laeng boransathan [Information of ancient sites]. Ministry of Culture. https://digital.m-culture.go.th/artandculture.html
Fine Arts Department. (2022). Lakkaan lae naeothaang nai kaan anurak mo̜rradok sathaapattayakam mai [Principles and approaches in wooden built heritage] conservation. Amarin printing and publishing.
Forests Act (No.8), B.E. 2562 (2019). (April 16, 2019). Government Gazette, 136, part 50 A, 106–110. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2562/A/050/T_0106.PDF
Góral, A. (2015) Cultural heritage as a shared resource. The role of collaboration between stakeholders in cultural heritage management. In L. Gaweł & E. Kocój (Eds.) Cultural heritage, management, identityand potential (pp. 55–56). Jagiellonian University Press.
Historic England. (2021). Listed building consent: Historic England advice note 16. https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/listed-building-consent-advice-note-16/heag304-listed-building-consent/
Historic England. (2023a). Listed buildings identification and extent. https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/hpg/has/listed-buildings/
Historic England. (2023b). Transfer of ownership by agreement. https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/hpg/consent/lbc/
Huuhka, S., & Vestergaard, I. (2020). Building conservation and the circular economy: A theoretical consideration. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 10(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2019-0081
International Council on Monuments and Sites. (1931).The Athens Charter for the restoration of historic monuments. https://www.icomos.org/en/167-the-athens-charter-for-the-restoration-of-historic-monuments
International Council on Monuments and Sites. (1964).The Venice Charter. https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/157-thevenice-charter
International Council on Monuments and Sites. (1994). The Nara Document on Authenticity. https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/386-the-nara-document-on-authenticity-1994
International Council on Monuments and Sites. (1999). Charter on the Built Vernacular Heritage. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/vernacular_e.pdf
International Council on Monuments and Site. (2013). The Burra Charter. https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Burra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf
International Council on Monuments and Site. (2017). Principles for the Conservation of Wooden Built Heritage. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/General_Assemblies/19th_Delhi_2017/Working_Documents-First_Batch-August_2017/GA2017_6-3-4_WoodPrinciples_EN_final20170730.pdf
Laohaviraphap, N., & Mahaek, E. (2023). Cultural revitalization of Tha Phae road: An in-depth exploration of contemporary Lanna architectural facades and urban identity. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 22(2), Article 313. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202322313
Larsen, K. E., & Marstein, N. (2016). Conservation of historic timber structures. An ecological approach. Riksantikvaren.
Makka, M. (2020). Transition of teak timber supply chain in architecture [Master's thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. http://www.doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.THE.2020.1230
Matichon. (2019). The Ministry of Labor, Fine Arts Department, and UNESCO confer the certification of 'wood Craftsman,' guaranteeing the skill in heritage conservation. Retrieved September 26, 2023, from https://www.matichon.co.th/local/quality-life/news_1708988
Ministry of Culture. (2018). Historical sites. https://digital.m-culture.go.th/artandculture.html
Mulligan, M. E., & Lippit, Y. (2014). The thinking hand: Tools and traditions of the Japanese carpenter. Edwin O. Reischauer Institute.
Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2018). Registry of old community areas in the central region. https://culturalenvi.onep.go.th/post/detail/46
Office of natural resources and environmental policy and planning. (2020). Report on the number of registered archaeological sites (2009–2021). http://env_data.onep.go.th/reports/subject/view/165
Palakavong Na Ayudhya, S. (1994). 70 years of conserving architectural heritage. NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment, 12, 30–48.
Panin, T., & Mokkhasmita, T. (2021). Adaptive vernacular: A search for future houses in eastern region of Thailand . Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 20(2), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202120113
Peerapun, W., Sereerat, S., Sanit, P., Vichienpradit, P., & Wi-te, Y. (2020). Master planning for conservation and development of Krung Rattanakosin 2032. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 19, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ2020193958
Pimonsathean, Y. (2022). Heritage city needs new conservation law. Bangkok Post. Retrieved July 4, 2023, from https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/2370991/city-heritage-needs-
Poulios, I. (2014). Discussing strategy in heritage conservation: Living heritage approach as an example of strategic innovation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 16–34.
Sakunjaroenpornchai, P., & Viryasiri, T. (2018). The restoration management of Mrigadayavan Palace. NAJUA: History of Architecture and Thai Architecture, 15, 172–195. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NAJUA/article/view/163361
Seub Nakhasathien Foundation. (2020). Forest report in Thailand 2019–2020. https://www.seub.or.th/document/
Shrestha, A. (2017). Shortage of timber hits reconstruction of monuments. Myrepublica. https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/shortage-of-timber-hits-reconstruction-of-monuments/
Silapacharanan, S. (2016). The creation and conservation of Saint Paul Church, Thailand. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 1(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v1i3.366
Tansukanun, P. (2015). The dynamism of old wooden houses within Chiang Mai city wall. The Fifth Asian Conference on Sustainability, Energy and the Environment 2015 Official Conference Proceedings (pp.11–14).
The Japanese Association for Conservation of Architectural Monuments. (n.d.) Conservation approach. https://www.bunkenkyo.or.jp/en/conserva.html
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/15164-EN.pdf
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). Announcement: Seeking applicants for training in Thai wood architectural conservation. https://bangkok.unesco.org/content/Training-for-the-conservation-of-Thai-wooden-architecture
Tienthavorn, T. (2019). Transformation of cultural landscape through resilience lens: A case study of Mae Kampong Village, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 16, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ20191685100
Tienthavorn, T. (2023). The practical renovation of a privately-owned wooden house: Case of Khun Prasit’s House, Ang Thong province, Thailand. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS), 21(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v21.255027
Valdebenito, G., Vásquez, V., Prieto, A. J., & Alvial, J. (2021). The paradigm of circular economy in heritage preservation of southern Chile. Arquiteturarevista, 17(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.4013/arq.2021.171.05
Vellinga, M. (2014). Indonesia’s endangered architecture. The Architecture Review. https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/indonesias-endangered-architecture
Viengsima, S. (2022). Materials, tools, and methods in wooden architecture conservation. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Bangkok.