The Relationship Between Inter-Legality and Organized Social Processes in Land Formalization Practices in The Sovereignty-Contested Area of Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar

Main Article Content

Asis Ammarapala
Peamsook Sanit

Abstract

The study considers the Dawei Special Economic Zone (DSEZ) project, which was a land formalization case in a sovereignty-contested area conducted by de jure Myanmar state, de facto Karen Nation Union (KNU), and an international developer. The DSEZ project planning comprised deep-sea Ports, 250 sq. kms of industrial estate zone, and the two-lane 148 km road linking Dawei in Myanmar and Kanchanaburi Province of Thailand as its main features. Recent studies of Myanmar land institutions in sovereignty-contested areas have mainly discussed the factor of "inter-legality," the integration of non-state land laws, as the solution for land disputes between the central state and armed ethnic political groups. However, the real-world case in this study indicated a second factor, "organized social processes," working in correspondence with the first factor. This research paper explores how the two factors were used together the integration of customary land practice into statutory property institutions, influencing changes in the structure and process of land formalization practices, and illustrates the unclear property institutions of sovereignty-contested frontiers. This research paper is a single case study that benefited from the researcher's five years of work experience in the DSEZ project's design, planning, and land acquisition. The obtained information comprises the project's land formalization documentation, published land laws which were checked with the project manager using the triangulation method, and local newspaper clippings. The study concludes that inter-legality and organized social processes should be used together in practice planning to form more context-oriented land formalization practices, employing collective community memory to reduce institutional inertia. Furthermore, the mutually-agreed standards can help avoid direct power contestation between the de jure and de facto.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ammarapala, A., & Sanit, P. (2023). The Relationship Between Inter-Legality and Organized Social Processes in Land Formalization Practices in The Sovereignty-Contested Area of Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar. Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 22(3), Article 320. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202322320
Section
Research Articles

References

Associate Citizen Law, 1982, c. 3 (Myanmar).

Bangkok Post. (2011, June 9). Dawei financing deals imminent, ITD looks to sell stakes to investors. http://www.bangkokpost.com/business/economics/241310

Boutry, M., Allaverdian, C., Mellac, M., Huard, S., San Thein, Tin Myo Win, & Khin Pyae Sone. (2017). Land tenure in rural lowland Myanmar: From historical perspectives to contemporary realities in the dry zone and the delta. Of Lives of Land Myanmar Research Series.

BurmaNet. (2011, August 3). Tavoy-Kanchanaburi will continue to see resistance says KNU. http://www.burmanet.org/news/

Chummee, C., & Poudpongpaiboon, S. (2015). Thailand’s special economic zone- national roadmap and new opportunities to watch out. SCB Economic Intelligence Center. https://www.scbeic.com/en/detail/product/1167

Durand-Lasserve, A., & Selod, H. (2009). The formalization of urban land tenure in developing countries. Urban land markets: Improving land management for successful urbanization (pp. 101–132). Springer Netherlands.

Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure, 2015, c. 8 (Myanmar).

Farmland Law, 2012, c. 6 (Myanmar).

Hall, D. (2013). Land. Cambridge Polity Press.

Hong, E. (2017). Scaling struggles over land and law: Autonomy, investment, and interlegality in Myanmar's Borderlands. Geoforum, 82, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.017

International Commission of Jurists. (2017). Myanmar SEZ assessment: Publications & reports thematic reports 2017. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Myanmar-SEZ-assessment-Publications-Reports-Thematic-reports-2017-ENG.pdf

Kamoethway Indigenous People and Nature Land Use Policy, 2012, c. 12 (Rays of Kamoethway Indigenous People and Nature).

Karen News. (2011, July 19). KNU Stops Tavoy Road Construction. Retrieved July 19, 2011, from http://karennews.org/2011/07/knu-stops-tavoy-road-construction.html/.

Karen News. (2011, October 23). Burma army sends reinforcements to secure tavoy-Kanchanaburi road construction. Karen News. Retrieved October 23, 2011, from http://karennews.org/2011/10/burma-army-sends-reinforcements-to-secure-tavoy-kanchanaburi-road-construction.html.

Kawthoolei [KNU Land Law], 1974, c. 9 (Karen National Union).

Kawthoolei [KNU Land Law], 2009, c. 10 (Karen National Union).

Kawthoolei [KNU Land Law], 2015, c. 11 (Karen National Union).

Land Nationalization Act, 1962, c. 2 (Myanmar).

Land Tenure and Development Technical Committee. (2015). Formalising land rights in developing countries: Moving from past controversies to future strategies. Ministère des Affaires étrangères et du Développement International (Maedi), Agence Française de Développement (AFD). https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Formalising-land-rights.pdf

Loewen, E. (2012). States, capital, and enclosures. Thailand, Myanmar, and the Dawei special economic zone. International Institute of Social Studies, Graduate School of Development Studies, the Hague, Netherlands.

Mark, S. (2016). Fragmented sovereignty” over property institutions: developmental impacts on the Chin Hill communities. Independent Journal of Burmese Scholarship, 1(1), 125–160. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/93533

Mass Communication Organization of Thailand (2011, October 6). Thailand, Myanmar agree to strengthen cooperation at all levels. MCOT Digital. http://www.mcot.net/cfcustom/cache_page/277280.html.

Myanmar Special Economic Zone Law, 2008 (Myanmar)

Myanmar Special Economic Zone Law, 2015 (Myanmar)

Oh, S. A. (2013). Competing forms of sovereignty in the Karen State of Myanmar. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Peluso, N., Kelly, A. B., & Woods, K. (2012). Context in land matters: The effects of history on land formalizations. Center for International Forestry Research.

Santasombat, Y. (2016). The border (1st ed.). The Thailand Research Fund.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.

Scurrah, N., Hirsch, P., & Woods, K. (2015). The political economy of land governance in Myanmar. Mekong Region Land Governance. https://www.mekonglandforum.org/sites/default/files/Political_Economy_of_Land_Governance_in_Myanmar.PDF

Thabchumpon, N., Middleton, C., Aung, Z., Chundasutathanakul, S., & Tarmedi, F. A. (2014, December, 8–10). Military brotherhood between Thailand and Myanmar: From ruling to governing the borderlands. Fourth Conference of the Asian Borderlands Research Network Conference, “Activated Borders: Re-openings, Ruptures and Relationships,” City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

The Irrawaddy. (2011, July 29). Italian-Thai Company Workers Flee Burma Conflict. Retrieved July 29, 2011, from http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=21799.

The Straits Times Singapore. (2011, July 27). Myanmar plans massive deepwater port, shipping and logistics link between India and S.E. Asia could rival Spore: Nirmal Ghosh. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://NewspaperSG - The Straits Times, 27 July 2011 (nlb.gov.sg)

Vacant Fallow and Virgin Law, 2012 (Myanmar)

Woods, K. (2011). Ceasefire capitalism: Military–private partnerships, resource concessions and military–state building in the Burma–China borderlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607699