Understanding Thai Urban Pedestrian Culture During Noon Break: How Sidewalk Users Experience the Walking Infrastructure in Bangkok, Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The noon break or lunch hour in Bangkok’s central business district (CBD) is when pedestrians wander around for various activities and purposes, in addition to having a meal, within a limited time frame. It is the only break from their daily working routines for energy recovery or socializing, which, in turn, increases readiness to continue working in the afternoon. Commercial activities preferred by pedestrians during this break contribute to increased economic activity. Since pedestrian behavior depends on the cultural context, this research aims to understand Thai urban pedestrian culture that benefits the public, both socially and economically, and to investigate pedestrians’ experience of the physical quality of their walking infrastructure, reflecting their preferences.
According to the information gained from observation, a field survey of four hundred thirty observations, and descriptive statistics, the urban pedestrian culture in the CBD of Bangkok is a combination of various activities related to a way of life; 69.4% and 44.9% of observed pedestrians have secondary and tertiary purposes. These multi-purpose trips during lunch hours include having meals, shopping, recovery from work, socializing, and taking care of business or running errands. The routine of lunch outings declined only slightly after the start of the pandemic in early 2020 compared to the pre-pandemic level (81.8% compared to 94.9%). Socializing has strong presence in the culture; 90.5% of group outings occur at least once or twice a week.
On the physical side, the walking infrastructure, mainly comprising sidewalks, is used for circulation and as a place for social and economic settings. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, pedestrians’ concerns about the physical environment were divided into five groups, as follows: Cluster 1, people concerned about thermal comfort, surface conditions, and sidewalk obstructions. Cluster 2, people concerned about thermal comfort and walking distance. Cluster 3, people concerned about level changes and walking distance. Cluster 4, people concerned about surface conditions and sidewalk obstructions. Lastly, cluster 5, people concerned about sidewalk obstructions, traffic safety, and level changes.
In conclusion. significant problems experienced or causing concern to pedestrians include sidewalk obstructions of flow due to insufficient width of the walking space as well as blockages caused by utility infrastructure, or social or economic activities, walking distance, surface conditions of sidewalks, level changes, thermal comfort, and traffic safety, respectively. These experiences and concerns reflect pedestrians’ preference for better quality of walking infrastructure. Therefore, inducing walkability is a promising physical strategy for promoting and sustaining Thai urban pedestrian culture.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Anantsuksomsri, S., & Tontisirin, N. (2015). The impacts of mass transit improvements on residential land development values: Evidence from the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.982791
Appleyard, D. (1980). Livable streets: Protected neighborhoods? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271628045100111
BMA. (2013). Bangkok Landuse Plan 2556. Department of City Planning and Urban Development. http://www.bangkok.go.th/cpud/page/sub/18991/ผังเมืองรวมกรุงเทพมหานคร-พศ2556
Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., Amburgey, J. W., & Szalay, C. (2007). Walkable route perceptions and physical features. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506295569
Buchanan, C. (1963). Traffic in towns: A study of the long-term problems of traffic in urban areas. Waterlow & Sons Ltd.
Burton, E., & Mitchell, L. (2006). Inclusive urban design: Streets for life (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080456454
Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O. L., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L. F., & Neiman, A. (2009). Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from Bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3(4), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310802178314
Corpuz, G., Hay, A., & Merom, D. (2005). Walking for transport and health: Trends in Sydney in the last decade. 28th Australasian Transport Research Forum, ATRF 05, 1–15.
Demerath, L., & Levinger, D. (2003). The social qualities of being on foot: A theoretical analysis of pedestrian activity, community, and culture. City & Community, 2(3), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00052
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Geurts, S. A. E., & Taris, T. W. (2009). Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. In Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being (Vol. 7, Issue 2009). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2009)0000007006
Duncan, M., & Mummery, K. (2005). Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland. Preventive Medicine, 40(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.017
Gallin, N. (2001). Quantifying pedestrian friendliness - guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service. Road and Transport Research, 10(1), 47–55.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space (Vol. 8, Issue 1). Island Press. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.8.1.54
Gerike, R., Koszowski, C., Schröter, B., Buehler, R., Schepers, P., Weber, J., Wittwer, R., & Jones, P. (2021). Built environment determinants of pedestrian activities and their consideration in urban street design. Sustainability, 13(16), 9362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169362
Hartman, G. W. (1950). The Central Business District-A study in urban geography. Economic Geography, 26(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/141260. JSTOR 141260
Horning, J., El-Geneidy, A., & Krizek, K. J. (2008). Perceptions of walking distance to neighborhood retail and other public services. Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, January 13-17, 2008, Washington, DC. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229051014_Perceptions_of_walking_distance_to_neighborh%0Aood_retail_and_other_public_services
Israel, G. D. (1992). Determination of sample size. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS.
Koerniawan, M. D., & Gao, W. (2016). Investigation and evaluation of thermal comfort and walking comfort in hot-humid climate case study: The open spaces of Mega Kuningan-Superblock in Jakarta. International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology (BUILT), 6(July), 53–72.
Lo, R. H. (2009). Walkability: What is it? Journal of Urbanism, 2(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903092867
Mateo-Babiano, I. (2009). Redefining the Asian space: A comparative view of evolving street culture and pedestrian space development in Bandung, Bangkok and Manila. In Asian Transformations in Action: The work of the 2006/2007 API Fellows (1st ed., pp. 214–223). The Nippon Foundation.
Mateo-Babino, I., & Ieda, H. (2007). Street space sustainability in Asia: The role of the Asian pedestrian and street culture. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 7, 1915–1930. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastpro.2007.0.242.0
Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: Pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism, 1(3), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480
Nonthapot, S. (2019). The impact of economic factors on street food consumer choice in Nong Khai municipality, Nong Khai province, Thailand. Management Science Letters, 9(Special Issue 13), 2337–2346. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.021
Nuzir, F. A., & Dewancker, B. J. (2016). Redefining place for walking: A literature review and key-elements conception. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 11(1), 59–76.
Pasciana, R., Pundenswari, P., & Sadrina, G. (2020). Street vendor management in Indonesia and Thailand. In Managing Learning Organization in Industry 4.0 (pp. 272–278). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003010814-49
Peerapun, W., Sereerat, S., Sanit, P., Vichienpradit, P., & Wi-Te, Y. (2020). Master planning for conservation and development of krung rattanakosin 2032. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 19, 39-59. https://doi.org/10.54028/nj2020193958
Pongprasert, P., & Kubota, H. (2017). Switching from motorcycle taxi to walking: A case study of transit station access in Bangkok, Thailand. IATSS Research, 41(4), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.03.003
Resuloğlu, Ç. (2020). Is it possible to re-design livable urban streets? In S. Şatır (Ed.), Academic Studies in Architecture, Planning and Design-II (1st ed., pp. 87–99). Gece Publishing. https://www.gecekitapligi.com/Webkontrol/uploads/Fck/Architecture_yayin_1.pdf#page=93
Saswattawong, T. (2009). Lunching behavior of working persons in Mueang Chiang Mai district individual research in the program of Master of Business Admiration. Chiangmai University.
Shriver, K. (1997). Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 1(961076), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.3141/1578-09
Soest, D. V., Tight, M. R., & Rogers, C. D. F. (2020). Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1575491
Sueur, C., Class, B., Hamm, C., Meyer, X., & Pelé, M. (2013). Different risk thresholds in pedestrian road crossing behaviour: A comparison of French and Japanese approaches. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 58, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.027
Sukor, N. S. A., & Fisal, S. F. M. (2018). Factors influencing the willingness to walk to the bus stops in Penang Island. Planning Malaysia, 16(1), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i5.423
Takahashi, M., Fukuda, H., & Arito, H. (1998). Brief naps during post-lunch rest: Effects on alertness, performance, and autonomic balance. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 78(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050392
Thammapornpilas, J. (2015). Urban spatial development to mitigate urban heat island effect in the inner area of Bangkok. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, Vol. 11, 29–40. https://doi.org/https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakhara/article/view/104849
Tontisirin, N., & Anantsuksomsri, S. (2021). Measuring transit accessibility benefits and their implications on land value capture: A case study of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. In Annals of Regional Science (Vol. 67, Issue 2). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01053-2
Torres Chavarria, L. C., & Phakdee-auksorn, P. (2017). Understanding international tourists’ attitudes towards street food in Phuket, Thailand. Tourism Management Perspectives, 21, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.11.005
Trougakos, J. P., Beal, D. J., Green, S. G., & Weiss, H. M. (2008). Making the break count: An episodic examination of recovery activities, emotional experiences, and positive affective displays. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.30764063
Trougakos, J. P., Hideg, I., Cheng, B. H., & Beal, D. J. (2014). Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1072
Untermann, R. K. (1984). Accommodating the pedestrian: Adapting towns and neighborhoods for walking and bicycling (June 1984). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Villaveces, A., Nieto, L. A., Ortega, D., Ríos, J. F., Medina, J. J., Gutiérrez, M. I., & Rodríguez, D. (2012). Pedestrians’ perceptions of walkability and safety in relation to the built environment in Cali, Colombia, 2009-10. Injury Prevention, 18(5), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040223
Yang, Y., & Diez-Roux, A. V. (2012). Walking distance by trip purpose and population subgroups. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015