Ethical Relativism and Critical Regionalism: An Ethical Viewpoint on the Non-Western Architectural Professions

Main Article Content

Supasai Vongkulbhisal

Abstract

This paper focuses on the ethical theories and practices relating to Critical Regionalism, Tropicality, and Contemporary Vernacular today. Ethical Relativism is selected as a main ethical philosophy to question, challenge, and examine the hybridized fusion that results when the complex structural dislocation of Western modern discourse is applied to different regional grounds far from its origin. Ethical Relativism denies that there is a single moral standard which is equally applicable to all people at all times. The empirically ascertained fact of this ethics is that there are a great many different and even conflicting rules and practices prevailing at different times and in different place. Therefore the same act may be regarded as right in one place and as wrong in another.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vongkulbhisal, S. (2017). Ethical Relativism and Critical Regionalism: An Ethical Viewpoint on the Non-Western Architectural Professions. Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 13, 89-98. Retrieved from https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakhara/article/view/104611
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Supasai Vongkulbhisal, College of Built Environments, University of Washington, USA

Supasai Vongkulbhisal is currently a Ph.D. student in the Built Environment at the University of Washington.
She holds a MS.Arch in History and Theory from the same University and M.Arch from the University of
Texas at Austin. She is interested in the role vernacular plays in relationship with modernism: how modern
architecture intervenes with its environmental surrounding and what technology might have changed the
continuity of each nation’s architectural culture.

References

Anderson, S. (2005). The vernacular, memory, and architecture. In M. Umbach & B. Huppauf (Eds.), Vernacular modernism: heimat, globalization, and the built environment (pp. 157-171). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bishop, S., David, C., Kastner, K., & Nassali, F. (n.d.). Colonialism, Nationalism, Neocolonialism [PDF filed]. Retrieved from https://www.columbia.edu/~kjk2124/Pol _Dev_3rd_ world_Presentation.pdf

Blomquist, T. W. (1990). Reviewed Work(s) [Review of the book Before european hegemony: The world system, A.D. 1250-1350, by Janet L. Abu- Lughod]. The Business History Review, 64(2), 362-364.

Borch, C., Bohme, G., Eliasson, O., & Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Architectural atmospheres on the experience and politics of architecture. Basel/Berlin/Boston: Birkhauser.

Difference Between (2014). Difference between colonialism and neocolonialism. Difference Between. Retrieved from https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-colonialism-and-vs-neocolonialism/

Fainstein, S. S. (2010). Philosophical approaches to the problem of justice. In The just city (pp. 23-56). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Fisher, S. (2012). How to think about architectural ethics. In W. Fox (Ed.), Ethics and the built environment (pp. 172). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

Frampton, K. (1983). Towards a critical regionalism: six points for an architecture of resistance. In H. Foster (Ed.), The Anti- Aesthetic: essays on postmodern culture (pp. 16-30). Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.

Gowans, C. (1997). Moral relativism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hyatt Foundation (2017). Wang Shu 2012 Laureate: Jury citation. The Pritzker Architecture Prize. Retrieved from https://www.pritzkerprize.com/2012/jury-citation

Ingersoll, R. (1999). Introductory essay—twentieth-century North American architecture: technocratic prowesss, historical legitimation, and ecological resistance. In K. Frampton (Ed.), World architecture 1900-2000: a critical mosaic 1 (pp. XVI- LV). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Wien.

Jumsai, S. (1988). Naga: Cultural origins in Siam and the West Pacific. Singapore: Oxford Univeristy Press.

Kraft, D. (2017). Cultural relativism vs. ethical relativism. People of our everyday life. Retrieved from https://peopleof.oureverydaylife.com/cultural-relativism-vs-ethical-relativism-3194.html

Ladd, J. (1973). Ethical relativism. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Lefaivre, L. (2003). Critical regionalism: a facet of modern architecture since 1945. In L. Lefaivre and A. Tzonis (Eds.), Critical regionalism: architecture and identity in a globalized World (pp. 24-55). New York, NY: Prestel.

Lim, W. S. W. (2003). Alternative (post)modernity. Singapore: Select Publishing.

Lim, W. S.W. (1999). Introductory essay—Southeast Asia: nowhere to somewhere and beyond. In K. Frampton (Ed.), World architect 1900-2000: a critical mosaic (pp. 17-29). New York: Springer-Verlag Wien, China Architecture & Building Press.

Mastin, L. (2008). Moral universalism. The Basics of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.philosophybasics. com/branch_moral_universalism.html

Merin, G. (2013). AD Classics: Modern architecture international exhibition / Philip Johnson and Henry-Russell Hitchcock. Archdaily. Retrieved from https://www. archdaily.com/409918/ad-classics-modern-architecture-international-exhibition-philip-johnson-and-henry-russell- hitchcock

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York, NY: Rizzoli.

Passanti, F. (1997). The vernacular, modernism, and Le Corbusier. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 56(4), 438-451.

Phillips, J. (2003). Introduction William Lim: the evolution of an alternative. In W. S. W. Lim’s Alternative (post)modernity (pp. 7). Singapore: Select Publishing.

Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Stott, R. (2014). Why china’s president says “no more weird buildings.” Archdaily. Retrieved from https://www. archdaily.com/559456/why-china-s-president-says-no-more-weird-buildings

Shomali, M. A. (2001). Ethical relativism: an analysis of the foundations of morality. London: Islamic College for Advanced Studies Press.

Wainwright, O. (2014). Zaha Hadid’s Tokyo Olympic stadium slammed as a ‘monumental mistake’ and a ‘disgrace to future generations.’ The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/architecture-design-blog/2014/nov/06/zaha-hadids-tokyo-olympic-stadium-slammed- as-a-monumental-mistake-and-a-disgrace-to-future-generations

Xiaomei, C. (1995). A wildman between the orient and the occident. In Occidentalism: a theory of counter-discourse in post-Mao China (pp. 99-117). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.