Optimization of Condition Using Response Surface Methodology for Boring Process in S20C Carbon Steel

10.14416/j.ind.tech.2025.12.006

Authors

  • Julaluk Rodjananugoon Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Apichon Thongmung Kamnerdwam Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Surasit Rawangwong Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya;Materials Processing Technology Research Unit, Department of Industrial Engineering,Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Chainarong Srivabut Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Wikanet Phetsuwan Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Nattawat Narato Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya
  • Tanat Sangngam Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya

Keywords:

Box-Behnken, Boring, Speed, Overhang length, S20C carbon steel

Abstract

This research designed a Box-Behnken experiment and analyzed it using surface response methodology to predict the boring process of carbon steel grade S20C. The experimental variables encompass speed from 800 to 1,700 rpm, feed rate from 0.04 to 0.08 mm/rev, depth of cut from 0.10 to 0.50 mm, and overhang length from 45 to 55 mm. The experiment found that all the main factors affecting the surface roughness values were speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and overhang length. The surface roughness values increase significantly as speed decreases. Moreover, the surface roughness tends to decrease when decreasing the feed rate, depth of cut, and overhang length. The optimal conditions for surface roughness (Ra) of 2.267 micrometers were speed of 1,685 rpm, feed rate of 0.04 mm/rev, depth of cut of 0.39 mm, and overhang length of 45 mm. The experimental results were confirmed by comparing the predicted values with the actual measured values from the experiment, with a maximum surface roughness prediction error of 5%. The comparison of the experimental results revealed that the mean absolute percentage error value of the surface roughness was 3.16 percent, which is less than the specified error value and remains within the acceptable range.

References

P. Ruksorn and S Deepradit, The prediction of surface roughness in the S45C turning process by using response surface design, Thai Journal of Operations Research, 2019, 7, 13-19

S. Singh and R. Kumar, Optimization of process parameters in boring operation: A review, Pramana Research Journal, 2018, 8, 498-502.

P. Kumar, J.S. Oberoi, C. Singh and H. Dhiman, Analysis and optimization of parameters affecting surface roughness in boring process, International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 4, 647-655.

I.A. Choudhury and M.A. EI-Baradie, Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2013, 67, 55-61.

A.M. Badadhe, S.Y. Bhave and L.G. Navale, Optimization of cutting parameters in boring operation, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 2013, 10-15.

P.V. Mayuresh and S.A. Sonawane, Analysis and optimization of boring process parameters by using Taguchi method on SAE 1541, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2014, 3, 59-63.

A. Sankar and D. Soumyalata, Comparative assessment of carbide insert and cermet insert on surface roughness in boring of ASTM A48 grey cast iron, International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 6, 440-445.

J. Rodjananugoon, S. Rawangwong and C. Homkhiew, Surface Roughness Prediction in boring turning of ductile cast iron using response surface methodology and tool wear, RMUTL Engineering Journal, 2021, 6, 1-10.

S.J. Raykar and N.M. Qureshi, Analysis and optimization of precision boring process for HE 30 aluminum automotive component, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 2015, 2, 863-868.

J. Suteja, Y. Haryono, A. Harianto and E. Rinawiyanti, Optimization of boring process parameters in manufacturing of polyacetal bushing using high speed steel, E3S Web of Conferences, IC-AMME 2018, 2019, 1-7.

D. Vivek and K. Ramesh, Optimization of the cutting responses in boring operation using response surface methodology, International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2014, 3, 1739-1744.

S. Chockalingam, U. Natarajan and S.K. Sundaram, Modeling and optimization of tool wear in a passively damped boring process using response surface methodology, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2016, 69, 1443-1448.

S. Rawangwong, C. Homkhiew, J. Rodjananugoon and A.T. Kamnerdwam, Application of response surface methodology to determine an optimized condition value and the prediction of surface roughness in turning boring in aluminum 6061 with carbide cutting Tools, IE Network Conference 2019, Proceeding, 2019, 184-190.

A.T. Kamnerdwam and S. Rawangwong, Application of Box–behnken experimental design with response surface methodology for prediction of surface roughness in boring turning of carbon steel grade S45C, Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science, 2022, 12, 14-17.

G.E.P. Box and D.W. Behnken, Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables, Technometrics, 1960, 2(4), 455-475.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย (Research article)