Reviewer Guidance
|
Aspect |
What reviewers should check / focus on |
|
Originality / Plagiarism |
Assess whether the work is original, not overly similar to existing literature (similarity threshold as per journal). Check for self-plagiarism. |
|
Scope & Relevance |
The manuscript should align with the journal’s scope: informatics, technology, digital media, communication arts, etc. It should add theoretical or empirical contribution. |
|
Methodology / Soundness |
Review the appropriateness of methodology, clarity of experiments or empirical studies, adequacy of data analysis. Are the methods justified and well described? |
|
Structure & Format |
Check whether the manuscript follows the required structure: abstract, keywords, introduction, related work, methods, results, discussion, conclusion. Use of figures and tables; whether they’re embedded appropriately. References: proper APA style in-text and in the reference list. Manuscript length does not exceed 15 pages. Template usage respected. |
|
Clarity of Writing |
The manuscript should be understandable; clear writing, good grammar, appropriate language (English). Figures/tables should be clear. The data presented should support the conclusions. |
|
Contribution |
What new knowledge or insight this paper brings. Is it significant? Are limitations acknowledged? Are contributions clearly stated? |
|
Ethics |
Ethical considerations, data availability, any ethical implications of the work, declaration of AI use or competing interests if applicable. |