Main Article Content
The aim of the present study is to analyze the authorship pattern and collaboration trends in the Nature Nanotechnology during the first ten years period. Bibliographic records of the source journal are obtained from the Web of Science core collection. A total of 2060 articles published in the first ten years and those are analyzed in terms of authorship pattern. Various bibliometric tools such as collaborative co-efficient, degree of collaboration and co-authorship index are employed. Further, applicability of Lotka’s law is tested. The results show that 73% of total publications were collaborative in nature. The collaboration
co-efficient has been arrived at 0.58 and collaboration index is calculated to 6.76 for the first ten years. The value of Co-Authorship Index (CAI) for co-authored publications with more than three authors shows an increasing trend from first five year block period to another while for publications with few authors (<3), it
reveals a declining trend.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Arya, C. (2012). Authorship patterns and collaborative research trends in the field of veterinary medicine. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2 (1), 50-53.
Das, P.K. (2013). Journal of Informetrics: A bibliometric profile. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 33(3), 243-252.
Elango, B. and Rajendran, P. (2012). Authorship trends and collaboration pattern in the marine sciences literature: a scientometric study. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 2(3), 166-169.
Garg, K.C. and Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 415-427.
Goyal, V., Gupta, G.K. and Kumar, A. (2013). Authorship patterns and collaborative research trends in the field of chemical sciences. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 3(3), 184-186.
Koseoglu, M.A. (2016). Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: evidence from the Strategic Management Journal. BRQ Business Research Quality, 19, 153-170.
Lotka, A.J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.
Panda, I., Maharana, B. and Chhatar, D.C. (2013). The Journal of Information Literacy: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3 (3), 1-7.
Pao, M.L. (1985). Lotka’s law, a testing procedure. Information Processing and Management, 21, 305–320.
Pao, M.L. (1989). Concept of information retrieve. Colorado : Libraries Unlimited.
Santhanakarthikeyan, S., Grace, M. and Jeyshankar, R. (2014). Research publications to Indian Journal of Cancer: a scientometric analysis. Library Hi Tech News, 31(3), 21-25.
Rajgoli, I. and Laxminarsaiah, A. (2015). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of spacecraft technology. The Electronic Library, 33 (4), 625-642.
Ramakrishnan, J. and Thavamani, K. (2015). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of Hepatitis C. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 5 (1), 21-32.
Rice, E.W. (1983). Bibliometric evaluations of modern Clinical Chemistry are needed. Clinical Chemistry, 29 (10), 1858-1859.
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration. A review, Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38.
Swain, D.K. and Panda, K.C. (2012). Journal of intellectual property rights 2002-2010: a bibliometric study. Chinese Journal: an International Electronic Journal, 33.
Velmurugan, C. and Radhakrishnan, N. (2015). Scientometric observations of authorship trends and collaborative research on DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9 (2), 193-203.