The study of STEM Education management connecting the context of science teachers in the School of Extension for Educational Opportunities in the central region of Thailand

Main Article Content

Aungkana Koolnapadol

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to study the STEM education learning management connecting the context of science teachers in the School of Extension for Educational Opportunities in central regions of Thailand. Samples used in this study contain 36 science teachers from the School of Extension for Educational Opportunities in the central region.  Conditions for selecting the target groups are defined by considering in the quality in school zoning, school size, location and test results of basic national education (O-NET). The size of target samples is calculated using G * Power software, version 3.1.9.2.  Variables used for the study include STEM  Education learning management connecting the science teachers. Tools used to collect quantitative data are questionnaires regarding teaching practice. Data for analysis contains statistics, frequency statistics, and percentage. Tools used to collect qualitative data include interviewing forms. Analyzing of data for this study include content analysis and verification for the validity of the data by triangulation verification method.


From the quantitative data analysis, it is found that science teachers who participate in the research manage the STEM learning in various forms of connecting and in different proportions with the connection that uses a variety of data sources and link to the most real-life problems. Of 100 percent of teachers perform research from various sources for teaching planning accounted for more than 50 percent of the learning management hours. In addition, more than 90 percent of teachers have organized learning by linking context to solving problems in daily life of students, in proportion to more than 50 percent of learning management hours, while in linking the context of using community learning sources, inviting expert speakers and project-based learning management , these are in small proportion. 44 percent of teachers do not use learning resources in learning management and 80 percent of them invite external speakers to participate in learning management in the proportion of less than 50 percent of the study hours.


Qualitative data analysis represents the expectations of teachers in learning management which can be divided into 2 issues;


Issue 1: The expectation of science teachers to manage STEM learning in a full context consists of sub-issues, namely the use of teaching materials, comprehensive example raising, learning from actual conditions, the process in which students participate and summarize the lessons to connect the context.


                Findings from this research will be empirical data that shows the real situation in the STEM learning management with linking the context in the School of Expansion for Educational Opportunities in the central region which will be a reference for the policy department to use in the planning of the professional development process for  the School of Expansion to promote learning that focuses on linking and practical utilization to enable students in the School of Expansion to receive education at with equal quality. In addition, the results of the research also reflect obstacles in implementing the policy into practice in the classroom as well.


 

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017). National Education Plan 2017-2036. Bangkok:
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018). Policy of the Office of the Basic Education Commission, fiscal year 2018. Retrieved June 1, 2019, from The Office of the Basic Education Commission Website:https://www.obec.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/obec61.pdf.

The Commission for Mass Communication, Science, Technology and information. (2015). Report on policy proposals for STEM education. Proactive policies for youth development and manpower in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
Retrieved March 25, 2019, from The Secretariat of the Senate Website:https://library.senate.go.th/document/Ext11101/11101417_0003.PDF.

Patcharin Kotsombat, Thitisak Vechama, and Surachet Noirit. (2015).
Development of management guidelines, academic work of the school of expansion for educational opportunities under the office of Maha Sarakham Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University, 9.

Benjaporn Jitru, 2016. Problems and guidelines for the development of academic administration of school of expansion for educational opportunities under the Office of Trat Primary Educational Service Area.

Suthira Prasertsan. 2015. STEM Education: New challenges of Thai education. Nam Sin Advertising Company Limited.

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology, Ministry of Education. (2018) Results of PISA Assessment 2015 Science, reading and Mathematics. Retrieved June 1, 2019, from Pisa Thailand Website: https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/isbn-9786163627179/


Office of the Education Council. (2016). Summarizing for the results of the 6th Thai-US Roundtable conference for Education7th , STEM Education: Learning Culture for Manpower in the 21st Century, 2018.
Retrieved June 1, 2019, from The Office of the Education Council Website:Retrieved from https://www.onec.go.th/index.php/book/BookView/1539.


ASEAN Education Center, MCU (2016). Down again! WEF rating of education 2014-2015 "Thai", All low quality "Laos-Khmer-Vietnam". Retrieved March 21, 2019 from ASEAM Studies Center Website: http: //www.asc.mcu.ac.th/? P = 5396.

Barber, J. P. (2012). Integration of learning: A grounded theory analysis of college students’ learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 590-617.

Breiner, J. M., Carla, C. J., Harkness, S. S., & Koehler, C. M.. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion
about conceptions of STEM in education and Shelly Sheats Harkness Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). A case for STEM education. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers’ Association Press.

Chamrat, S. (2016). STEM Education on the Road of Socially-Engaged Scholarship: Game Changer for Future Learning. Journal of Educational Review, 31, 3.

Dejarnette. (2012). America’s children: providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77–84.

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Song, X., Fu, Q., Chai, C. S., & Huang, Y. (2019). Exploring the Effects of Contextual Factors on In-Service Teachers’ Engagement in STEM Teaching. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 25-34.

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 3.

Horizons Research Inc. (2000a). Inside the Classroom Observation and Analytic Protocol. Retrieved
June 1, 2019 fromHorizon Research, Inc. Website:https://www.horizon-research.com/instruments/clas/cop.php.

OECD,(2017). PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT AND ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK: READING, MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE. Retrieved June 1, 2019, from OECD Website: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-development/PISA-D-Assessment-and-Analytical-Framework-Ebook.pdf/.

Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A
guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.

Pang, J., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School science and mathematics, 100(2), 73-82.

Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444-467.

STEM EDUCATION THAILAND. (2014). Introsuction to TEM. Retrieved June 1, 2019, from STEM Education Thailand Website: https://www.stemedthailand.org.

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., ... & Hellinckx, L. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2.