Hybrid Proactive Learning using Business Intelligence to Promote Critical Thinking Skills
Abstract
The study proposes an instructional model entitled Active-Hybrid Learning Using Business Intelligence (BI), which integrates the principles of active learning and hybrid learning with business intelligence technologies to enhance learners’ analytical and problem-solving skills. This learning framework encourages learners to engage in critical thinking, analysis, and hands-on activities through both online and face-to-face modes. By utilizing BI tools such as market trend and consumer data analysis, learners gain real-world experience that strengthens their analytical thinking, digital literacy, and strategic decision-making skills, preparing them for the demands of the digital business environment. The research employed an expert evaluation method to examine the appropriateness of the designed Active-Hybrid Learning Platform Using Business Intelligence.
The findings indicated that the overall suitability of the platform design was rated at the highest level (M = 4.96,
SD = 0.08), and the overall implementation suitability was also at the highest level (M = 4.90, SD = 0.15). The results demonstrate that the proposed model is an effective and practical framework for promoting critical thinking and analytical competence among vocational learners. The integration of BI tools within the hybrid active learning environment enhances learners’ capacity to analyze, evaluate, and make informed decisions—skills essential for success in future digital-era professions.
References
Agustina, L., & Ro’isatin, U. A. (2024). The efficacy of case-based learning model integrated with critical thinking skills to improve EFL learners’ reading comprehension. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1443–1454. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.11619
Bamrungsetthapong, S., Tharnpanya, P., & Satjaharuthai, K. (2020). Hybrid learning and the quality improvement of Thailand’s education in the 21st century. Nakhabutr Review Journal, 12(3), 213–224. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakboot/article/view/245900
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom.
Brame, C. J. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-learning/
Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2019). Active learning: Thinking, doing, understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Cheerapakorn, P., Hinon, K., & Wannapiroon, P. (2024). Hybrid project-based learning model on Metaverse to enhance collaboration. International Education Studies, 17(6), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n6p65
Chukusol, C., Nilsook, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2022). Virtual board games platform. In Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress: Innovative Electricals and Electronics (RI2C) (pp. 273–277). Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/RI2C56397.2022.9910289
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 423.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63, 564-569.
Indeed. (2025). Critical thinking skills: Definition and examples. https://www.indeed.com
Kerdpunya, K. (2024). The management of hybrid learning after the epidemic of COVID-19: The case study of the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Journal of Education, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, 35(2), 14–26. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edupsu/article/view/260669
Khemmani, T. (2018). Science of Teaching: Knowledge of Efficient Learning Process Management. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Lestari, N., Syafril, S., Latifah, S., Engkizar, E., Damri, D., Asril, Z., & Yaumas, N. E. (2021). Hybrid learning on problem-solving abilities in physics learning: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 012021. https://doi:10.1088/1742-596/1796/1/012021
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
McKinsey. (2025). AI and business efficiency: Trends and insights. https://www.mckinsey.com
Nak-in, N., Phumpuang, K., Kongmanus, K., & Rueangrong, P. (2024). The development of a hybrid learning model based on the concept of active learning with digital platforms to promote digital intelligence for pre-service teachers. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 9(6), 622–636. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRKSA/article/view/270204/180684
National Education Association. (2021). Hybrid learning: The future of education? https://www.nea.org/
Office of the Vocational Education Commission. (2024). Guidelines for the development of vocational education curriculum 2024. Ministry of Education.
Owl Labs. (2025). The state of hybrid learning. Owl Labs. https://www.owllabs.com/
Panyaprouks, S. (2023). Hybrid learning to promote the ability of lesson plans writing and learning activities management for teacher students. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University, 21(2), 330–349. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedujournal/article/view/260679
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Phoyen, K. (2021). Active learning: Learning satisfy education in 21st century. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University, 19(1), 11–28. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal/article/view/254719
Pusitrattanavalee, S., Jinnge, P., & Yimsud, C. (2017). Active learning instructional model of teachers in Southern College Technology. Journal of Southern Technology, 10(1), 151–158. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_sct/article/view/87276
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30.
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, Article 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
Susanti, V. D., & Krisdiana, I. (2021). The effect of literacy skills on the critical thinking skills of mathematics education students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/ 10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.371
Utranan, S. (1982). Systematic Instructional Management. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Wongyai, V. & Pattaphol, M. (2020). Hybrid Learning desired performance in the New Normal. TheGraduate School of Srinakharinwirot University.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1-27.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Educational Communications and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
