@article{Sukadaecha_Paikoh_2021, title={Curriculum Evaluation of Bachelor Degree of Nursing Science Program (Revised Curriculum 2017), Vongchavalitkul University}, volume={34}, url={https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/vujournal/article/view/244655}, abstractNote={<p><strong>     Objective:</strong> This study aimed to evaluate the Bachelor Degree of Nursing Science Program (Revised Curriculum 2017), Vongchavalitkul University.</p> <p><strong>     Methods:</strong> Samples in this descriptive research were 38 instructors, 104 nursing students, 40 professional nurses, totaling 182 people who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected by using the questionnaire. The quality of research instrument was tested. The index of item objective congruence (IOC) was 0.66-1.00. The reliability of the questionnaire was 0.97. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics included mean ( ), standard deviation (S.D.), and content analysis.</p> <p><strong>     Results:</strong> The research findings displayed as follows. 1) The overall result of curriculum evaluation was at high level ( = 4.28, S.D. = 0.66). 2) The overall result of curriculum evaluation of the context was at high level ( = 4.38, S.D. = 0.64). Course objective, course structure, and course content were at high levels ( = 4.38, S.D. = 0.57, = 4.42, S.D. = 0.69, = 4.35, S.D. = 0.67). 3) The overall result of curriculum evaluation of the input was at high level ( = 4.29, S.D. = 0.68). Instructor, student, teaching and learning support factors were at high levels ( = 4.47, S.D. = 0.59, = 4.36, S.D. = 0.64, = 4.05, S.D. = 0.80). 4) The overall result of curriculum evaluation of the process was at high level ( = 4.36, S.D. = 0.67). Curriculum administration process, teaching and learning process, and measurement and evaluation process were at high levels ( = 4.41, S.D. = 0.62, = 4.26, S.D. = 0.72, = 4.41, S.D. = 0.68). 5) The overall result of curriculum evaluation of the product was at high level ( = 4.07, S.D. = 0.66). Desirable characteristics of the graduate, and learners’ learning outcomes according to the National Framework of Higher Education Qualifications were at high levels ( = 3.90, S.D. = 0.69, = 4.23, S.D. = 0.63). The following important issues should be considered to improve the curriculum; number of credit in some subjects should be tailored, the course content should be continuously updated, and quality of graduates should be concerned. The results of this research can be used by responsible person to improve quality of the curriculum.</p>}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Vongchavalitkul university}, author={Sukadaecha, Rungrat and Paikoh, Kanlaya}, year={2021}, month={Jun.}, pages={47–59} }