Performance Testing between ZigBee, LoRa and IEEE1888 Networks in Community Energy Management System

Main Article Content

Tanakorn Inthasuth
Kritsana Sureeya

Abstract

    The Community Energy Management System (CEMS) with IEEE1888 standard comprises buildings with metering systems and gateways (GW), which are linked to the system for efficient data management, and wireless systems installed in various places, which ZigBee is mostly used with the limitation only on short-range communication. Therefore, this paper presents the system development that extends the transmission from within ZigBee range to LoRa through aggregator (AG) and enables the transmission to be forwarded to the system with IEEE 1888 standard. The test results can be divided into 3 parts as follows: (1) Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI). For ZigBee, RSSI value increases from 5 to 20 meters upon an additional repeater is installed within the building. For LoRa, the maximum coverage in the test area reaches 573 meters with RSSI value equal to -95.1 dBm. (2) AG test. The result finds that in the case of data transmission is consistent with the period of 700 milliseconds and higher, the success rate is 100%. However, in the case of random transmission, the success rate is only 60%. (3) GW test, which is conducted by comparing the hop between GW and server. For the distance of 1 hop, the Round Trip Time (RTT) value does not exceed 100 milliseconds. Nevertheless, for the distance of 18 hops, the RTT value increase more than 4 times. Consequently, the tests in this research can be used as a guideline for design and development to optimize the future system extension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

[1] N. Hoonchareon, Development of smart grid system: Mae Hong Son case study. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Press (in Thai), 2016.

[2] S. G. Varghese, C. P. Kurian, V. I. George, A. John, V. Nayak and A. Upadhyay, “Comparative study of zigBee topologies for IoT-based lighting automation,” IET Wireless Sensor Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 201-207, 2019.

[3] V. Q. Son and N. T. A. Khoa, “Evaluation of full-mesh networks for smart home applications,” in Proc. of (ISEE) International Symposium on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, Oct. 2019, pp. 73-78.

[4] M. Centenaro, L. Vangelista, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi, “Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: The rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 60-67, Oct. 2016.

[5] W. San-Um, P. Lekbunyasin, M. Kodyoo, W. Wongsuwan, J. Makfak and J. Kerdsri, “A long-range low-power wireless sensor network based on U-LoRa technology for tactical troops tracking systems,” in Proc. of (ACDT) Third Asian Conference on Defense Technology, Phuket, Thailand, Jan. 2017, pp. 32-35.

[6] M. Lamkimel, N. Naja, A. Jamali, and A. Yahyaoui, “The Internet of Things: Overview of the essential elements and the new enabling technology 6LoWPAN,” in Proc 2018 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), Marrakech, Morocco, Nov. 2018, pp. 142-147.

[7] T. Inthasut and C. Aswakul, “Development and reliability testing of IEEE1888 gateway for ZigBee wireless sensor network in Chulalongkorn University’s building energy management system,” in Proc. of (ISIPS) 8th International Collaboration Symposium on Information, Production and Systems, Fukuoka, Japan, Nov. 2014, pp. 1-4.

[8] Laird Connect, “Zigbee Vs 6Lowpan for sensor networks,” LAIRDCONNECT.com. https://www.Lairdconnect.com/resources/white-papers/zigbee-vs-6lowpan-for-sensor-networks (accessed Nov. 28, 2020)

[9] K. Kaewwongsri and K. Silanon, “Design and implement of a weather monitoring station using CoAP on NB-IoT network,” in Proc. of (ECTI-CON) 17th International Conf. on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Phuket, Thailand, Jun. 2020, pp. 230-233.

[10] K. Lappanitchayakul, “Anti-theft device for car: Alert system using radio wave,” in Proc. of (ICIIBMS) International Conf. on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai, China, Nov. 2019, pp. 351-355.

[11] N. Vatcharatiansakul, P. Tuwanut, and C. Pornavalai, “Experimental performance evaluation of LoRaWAN: A case study in Bangkok,” in Proc. of (JCSSE) 14th International Joint Conf. on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand, Jul. 2017, pp. 1-4.

[12] P. Saatwong and S. Suwankawin, “An Interoperable building energy management system with IEEE1888 open protocol for peak-load shaving,” IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications, vol. 1, pp. 11-22, Jan. 2020.

[13] C. Suwannapruk, K. Juntula, and T. Inthasuth, “Development of ZigBee wireless energy instrument for building energy management system with IEEE1888 standard,” in Proc. of (RMUTCON) 11th Rajamangala University of Technology National Conference, Chaing Mai, Thailand, Jul. 2019, pp. 285-297.

[14] K. Sureeya and T. Inthasuth, “Packet traffic measurement of IEEE1888 write procedure between ZigBee gateway and storage for building energy management system,” in Proc. of (ITC-CSCC) 34th International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications, JeJu, South Korea, Jun. 2019, pp. 1-4.

[15] T. Inthasut, “Application of ZigBee wireless sensor and actuator network for building energy management system with IEEE1888 protocol,” M. Eng. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2013.

[16] K. Sureeya and T. Inthasuth, “Round trip time measurement of embedded proxy gateway communication between IEEE1888 smart energy and IoT cloud smart city platforms,” in Proc. of (ITC-CSCC) 35th International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications, Nagoya, Japan, Jul. 2020, pp. 202-206.