Main Article Content
The purpose of this research was to analyze the level of ethical leadership and analyze a structural‘s validity of indicators of ethical leadership for the students in faculty of Industrial education, King Mongkut's institute of technology ladkrabang. A multi - Stage Sampling randomized technique was used to recruit 312 students in faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang . The samples were taken by using Multi - Stage Sampling randomized technique. Research instrument was questionnaire with 5 rating scale. It consisted 32 questions for measurement of ethical leadership which divided into 4 sub-variables: justice, trust, responsibility, and communication. The questionnaire had 0.60 - 1.00 for item objective congruence (IOC), discriminative power was .50-.82 ,.52- .89 , .42-.86 and .43-.81 respectively. The reliability of .89 , .92, .88, and .89 respectively. The collected data were analyzed through the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The variables had a mean at a high to highest level. The coefficient distribution was at the appropriate level which the value not more than 20. The findings for Goodness of Fit Index with the construct validity of models was consistent with empirical data were ordered by the variable as follow; the justice variable model was X2=18.72; df=14; p-value=0.18; Relative X2=1.3371; RMSEA=0.033, the trust variable model was X2=17.44; df=16; pvalue=0.36; Relative X2=1.090; RMSEA=0.017, the responsibility variable model was X2=5.96; df=9; pvalue=0.74; Relative X2=0.662; RMSEA=0.00, and the communication variable model was X2=10.64; df=12; p-value=0.56; Relative X2=0.887; RMSEA=0.00 The indicators were consistent with a Construct Validity with empirical data.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
"The opinions and contents including the words in papers are responsibility by the authors."
"ข้อคิดเห็น เนื้อหา รวมทั้งการใช้ภาษาในบทความถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียน"
 Chaiset Promsri. 2006. The ethical Leadership for Administrators. Executive Journal, 26 (3), p. 20-25
 Bennis,W. 1997. Why Leaders Can’t Lead. San Francisco: Jossy – Bass.
 Ciulla,J. B. 2004. Ethics, The Heart of Leadership. 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger.
 Piyarat Thampitak. 2015. Ethical Leadership: Developing and Monitoring for the Quality of Multilevel Measuring Instruments. Behavioral Sciences Journal, 21 (1), p. 135-158.
 Piyarat Thampitak. 2015. A Study of Moral Leadership Behavior of Private Organization Administrators in Thailand. The National Conference “Academic of Srinakharinwirot” 7 th, Srinakharinwirot University Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.
 Thanyamai Chalamket. 2016. The Development of training curriculum for ethical leadership training for secondary school teachers. Doctoral degree in Ed.D. (Educational Administration) Bangkok: Graduate School Srinakharinwirot University.
 Nonglak Wiratchai and Rungnapa Tangjitcharoenkul. 2008. The Trend analysis of Thai moral changing. Bangkok: Center for the Promotion and Development of Moral Power. Office of Knowledge Management and Development (Public organization).
 Kohlberg, L.,Levine, C.;& Hewer A. 1983. Moral Stages : A Current Formulation and a response to Critics. Vol. 10. Basel:Karger.
 Reynolds, L. 1997. The trust effect: Creating the high performance organization. London: Nicholas Berkley.
 Joan Shapiro P.S.; & Jac Queline Stefkovich A.S. 2011. Ethical Leadership and Decision Making in Education. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
 Eloy, Anelo. 2012. Moral Leadership Model. Retrieved October, 30,2011, from statements.Bahai.org/92-0608.htm.
 Nonglak Wiratchai..1999. Lisrel Model: Statiscal for research. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
 Diamantopoulos,A. & Siguaw,A.D. 2000. Introducing LISREL : A guide for the uninitiated. Sage Publications, London.
 Supamat Angsuchot, Somthawin Wijitwan, and Ratchaneekun Pinyopanuwat.2009. Statistical for Social science and Behavioral science : Technique for using Lisrel Program. 2ed. Bangkok : Charoenmunkong Publishing.
 Parinya Meesuk. 2016. Analysis of Structural integrity of selected variable indicators related to vocational education. Journal of Industrial Education, 15(2). p. 86-93.